[Bug target/49423] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #27 from Charles Baylis --- I suspect this still remains as a latent bug. The zero/sign extend patterns still allow a memory operand, and there remains a subset of memory operands which will trigger the ICE (ie those which refer to a

[Bug target/49423] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 Charles Baylis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charles.baylis at linaro dot org

[Bug target/60609] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 --- Comment #5 from Charles Baylis --- I have proposed a fix for this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00122.html

[Bug target/60609] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609 Charles Baylis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charles.baylis at linaro dot org

[Bug target/59142] [4.8/4.9 Regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142 --- Comment #7 from Charles Baylis --- Comparing reduced.cpp.153r.cse1 in r172837 and the previous commit. --- reduced.cpp.153r.cse1 from gcc trunk r172835 [works] (insn 18 17 19 2 (parallel [ (set (mem/s:SI (reg/f:SI 138) [5 MEM[(st

[Bug target/59142] [4.8 / 4.9 Regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59142 Charles Baylis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||charles.baylis at linaro dot org