--- Comment #5 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com 2009-02-18
22:15 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Nope, only currently 4.2 and above are being maintained. Is there a reason
> why
> you unlikely to move to 4.x in the short term?
We have a big code base and
--- Comment #3 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com 2009-02-18
22:02 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Fixed in 4.1.0 as mentioned already. 3.3.x is no longer maintained and any
> bug
> that is reported against that old version is most likely not going to be eve
--- Comment #1 from caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com 2009-02-18
21:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=17327)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17327&action=view)
Preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237
-redhat-linux/3.2.3/../../../../lib64/crtn.o
--
Summary: Overloaded Operator delete not called
Product: gcc
Version: 3.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: caroline dot rioux at ca dot ibm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39237
