[Bug gcov-profile/101418] New: [Gcov] there is the executed line code in dead code

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101418 Bug ID: 101418 Summary: [Gcov] there is the executed line code in dead code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug gcov-profile/101417] New: [Gcov] an unexecuted if statement leads to incorrect coverage of a return statement

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101417 Bug ID: 101417 Summary: [Gcov] an unexecuted if statement leads to incorrect coverage of a return statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug gcov-profile/101416] New: [Gcov] wrong coverage for an if statement

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101416 Bug ID: 101416 Summary: [Gcov] wrong coverage for an if statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-p

[Bug gcov-profile/101414] New: [Gcov] a label statement has incorrect coverage due to an if statement

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101414 Bug ID: 101414 Summary: [Gcov] a label statement has incorrect coverage due to an if statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/101413] New: [Gcov] wrong coverage for a return statement

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101413 Bug ID: 101413 Summary: [Gcov] wrong coverage for a return statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gco

[Bug gcov-profile/101412] New: [Gcov] an if statement leads to incorrect coverage of the case statement

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101412 Bug ID: 101412 Summary: [Gcov] an if statement leads to incorrect coverage of the case statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug gcov-profile/101410] New: [Gcov] wrong coverage for a "default" statement

2021-07-11 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101410 Bug ID: 101410 Summary: [Gcov] wrong coverage for a "default" statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug gcov-profile/101409] New: [Gcov] the incorrect coverage of the "default” statement in the "if" statement

2021-07-10 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101409 Bug ID: 101409 Summary: [Gcov] the incorrect coverage of the "default” statement in the "if" statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug gcov-profile/101408] New: [gcov] "__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ " leads to incorrect coverage of case statement

2021-07-10 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101408 Bug ID: 101408 Summary: [gcov] "__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ " leads to incorrect coverage of case statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug gcov-profile/101360] New: [Gcov] the assignment statement is marked as executed twice while the similar statement has executed one time

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101360 Bug ID: 101360 Summary: [Gcov] the assignment statement is marked as executed twice while the similar statement has executed one time Product: gcc Version: 11.0

[Bug gcov-profile/101359] New: wrong coverage for a compound statement

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101359 Bug ID: 101359 Summary: wrong coverage for a compound statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov-pro

[Bug gcov-profile/101357] New: the coverage of a return statement goes wrong

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101357 Bug ID: 101357 Summary: the coverage of a return statement goes wrong Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gc

[Bug gcov-profile/101342] [Gcov] wrong coverage for the function with a loop statement

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101342 --- Comment #2 from Xiaoyuan Xie --- I clicked the wrong button on my page and the same content was submitted twice, please ignore the content in the description and directly read the comments 1.

[Bug gcov-profile/101342] [Gcov] wrong coverage for the function with a loop statement

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101342 Xiaoyuan Xie changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Gcov] Wrong coverage with |[Gcov] wrong coverage for

[Bug gcov-profile/101342] New: [Gcov] Wrong coverage with "for(;;a++)" loop statement

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101342 Bug ID: 101342 Summary: [Gcov] Wrong coverage with "for(;;a++)" loop statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug gcov-profile/101341] New: [Gcov] Wrong coverage with "for(;;a++)" loop statement

2021-07-06 Thread byone.heng at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101341 Bug ID: 101341 Summary: [Gcov] Wrong coverage with "for(;;a++)" loop statement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior