[Bug c++/51829] decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template

2012-10-15 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 --- Comment #8 from Seth Heeren 2012-10-15 21:14:45 UTC --- That is great. I confirmed this with gcc version 4.7.0 20111010 (experimental) [trunk revision 179769] The problem has been solved. Thanks everyone, Seth

[Bug c++/51829] decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template

2012-05-12 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 --- Comment #5 from Seth Heeren 2012-05-13 00:05:00 UTC --- On 13-05-12 00:46, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > Still waiting. Really. Well, to be honest, I can't afford to spend even more time minimizing that any further. I have to pick

[Bug c++/51829] decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template

2012-01-11 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 --- Comment #2 from Seth Heeren 2012-01-12 00:30:36 UTC --- To clarify, the valid code that was rejected looks like: auto expr = boost::spirit::qi::eps(false) | '1'; this might explain the 'strange' breaking up into e1 and e2 for the minim

[Bug c++/51829] decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template

2012-01-11 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 --- Comment #1 from Seth Heeren 2012-01-11 21:32:11 UTC --- Created attachment 26302 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26302 (gz) preprocessed source for the minimal testcase

[Bug c++/51829] New: decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template

2012-01-11 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51829 Bug #: 51829 Summary: decltype() deduces non-const but only in a template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

2011-05-03 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #19 from Seth Heeren 2011-05-03 15:47:28 UTC --- Cheers!

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

2011-04-27 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #14 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-27 09:48:57 UTC --- I just built a debian SID chroot and applied the diff to it's libstdc++6 (4.6.0-2), and tested your patch with the minimal.cpp from this bug report patch -p1 < ~sehe/attachment.cgi?id=

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

2011-04-27 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #15 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-27 09:51:26 UTC --- Probably redundant info, but the compiler used in my prior post is sehe@sid:~$ g++-4.6 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.6 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-g

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

2011-04-24 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #6 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-24 12:54:15 UTC --- That _is quick response. Thank you. I'll keep an eye on this one

[Bug libstdc++/48750] for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

2011-04-24 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 --- Comment #1 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-24 11:51:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24089 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24089 minimal example Compiled with g++ -g -O0 -fopenmp minimal.cpp -o minimal -save-temps

[Bug libstdc++/48750] New: for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[]

2011-04-24 Thread bugs at sehe dot nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750 Summary: for_each_template_random_access_ed has unbalanced new/delete[] Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Compo