https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #11 from Ignacy Gawędzki ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #10)
> Could you try trunk or the 14.2 RC1? A bunch of IPA fixes landed.
I tested with 162a1ed70303a031c81b0aaac499aaf394560390 and the problem is still
there with van
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #9 from Ignacy Gawędzki ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #8)
> While we wait for Honza, Ignacy, if you could try reduce it to get rid of
> the Boost dependency, it'd be appreciated.
I'm struggling to get a minimal example. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
--- Comment #5 from Ignacy Gawędzki ---
FWIW, I ran a git bisect from releases/gcc-10.5.0 to releases/gcc-11.1.0 and
the first bad commit is d119f34c952f8718fdbabc63e2f369a16e92fa07, which adds
modref/ipa_modref optimization passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
Ignacy Gawędzki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64 x86_64
--- Comment #3 from Ig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115767
Ignacy Gawędzki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs at qult dot net
--- Comment #1
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
Target Milestone: ---
I've stumbled upon what looks like a compiler bug with the following code,
compiled for aarch64:
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
using map_type = boost::
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
Target Milestone: ---
I what appears to be the minimal example below,
struct foo { int a; };
int main()
{
[](auto) {
if (int x = []{ return 0; }()) {
foo a;
(void) a;
}
}(0
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
Target Milestone: ---
The following code doesn't compile with -std=gnu++11 in any of GCC 4.9.4, 5.4.1
or 6.2.0:
#include
struc
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
Created attachment 35031
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35031&action=edit
Failing code with double parameter pack expansion.
The attached code fails to compile with pretty m
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
Created attachment 35022
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35022&action=edit
ICE-triggering source.
I get an ICE with the attached source, from version 4.8 on to the head of the
Git repository.
Output o
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
The following code is rejected by GCC while it is accepted by Clang.
struct Foo {
template
voidmeth();
};
struct Bar : private Foo {
using Foo::meth;
};
int main()
{
(void) &Bar::
ity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bugs at qult dot net
The following code, when compiled with -pedantic, compiles properly but
produces a warning about zero-sized array 'argv'.
#include
struct Foo {
12 matches
Mail list logo
