https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100348
Bug ID: 100348
Summary: RISC-V extra pointer adjustments for memcpy() from
glibc
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99068
--- Comment #9 from Brian Grayson ---
If I understand correctly, you're saying that it is sometimes preferred for gcc
to avoid update form, but even when the load and addi are next to each other
it's possible to use update form, like in the examp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99068
--- Comment #7 from Brian Grayson ---
A single lhau instruction is better than two instructions (lha + addi) for many
reasons. Are there reasons that you feel a two-instruction sequence of lha+addi
is *superior* to just an lhau?
On all PowerPC i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99068
Brian Grayson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99068
Brian Grayson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99068
Bug ID: 99068
Summary: Missed PowerPC lhau optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99067
Bug ID: 99067
Summary: Missed optimization for induction variable elimination
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98981
Bug ID: 98981
Summary: gcc-10.2 for RISC-V has extraneous register moves
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
