--- Comment #8 from bliss1940-bbs at yahoo dot com 2007-05-22 01:16 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> On arm-elf structures are padded/aligned to a 4-byte boundary. This is a
> "feature" of the ABI. The microsoft compiler obviously conforms to a different
> ABI, w
--- Comment #5 from bliss1940-bbs at yahoo dot com 2007-05-21 23:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Try:
> struct a33
> {
> struct Char1 a1;
> struct Char1 a2;
> };
> And see what size/offset the structs are at. Again this is an ABI issue
Simply saying it&#
--- Comment #4 from bliss1940-bbs at yahoo dot com 2007-05-21 23:22 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I'm using arm-elf. Thanks for the __attribute__((packed)). That does indeed
remove the hole at the end.
I think we should agree to disagree. You say it's an ABI issue but
--- Comment #2 from bliss1940-bbs at yahoo dot com 2007-05-21 22:18 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't think I said GCC was in error, but just different.
Maybe we can come to an agreement here, or maybe not. Let's see.
I certainly would expect the ARM7 would prefer t
t: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bliss1940-bbs at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32016
--- Additional Comments From bliss1940-bbs at yahoo dot com 2004-09-29 03:21
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could attach the preprocessed source?
I have discovered that the problem was in my code. The compiler is okay.
Please cancel this bug report.
Steve Bliss
--
h
