https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90890
--- Comment #6 from Bharat Mahajan ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> You got lucky. You gave the compiler invalid code. It can do
> anything with the code (including giving you a result that you
> may expect).
>
Ok I see. I chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90890
--- Comment #4 from Bharat Mahajan ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3)
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:08:43PM +0000, bharat.mahajan at hotmail dot com
> wrote:
> >
> > I forgot to mention that code runs with no issues
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90890
--- Comment #2 from Bharat Mahajan ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> (In reply to Bharat Mahajan from comment #0)
> > The following program fails with segfault:
> >
> > program test
> > implicit none
> > real, dimension(:), allo
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: bharat.mahajan at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following program fails with segfault:
program test
implicit none
real, dimension(:), allocatable :: a
integer :: b
a = [a, 2.0]
b = -100
end
