https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
--- Comment #6 from Bernhard Kaindl ---
Created attachment 45167
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45167&action=edit
Safe fix: Before copying work, check if the vectors have been allocated. If
not, input wasn't valid.
Fixes CV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181
--- Comment #12 from Bernhard Kaindl
---
x86 has no -fno-lra / -mno-lra flag in gcc-4.8.4 and 4.9.2,
so these compilers they can't show this issue.
Thus, the tag [4.8/4.9 Regression] does not apply and should be changed to
[4.5/4.6 regression].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
||thalesgroup dot com
--- Comment #3 from Bernhard Kaindl
2012-03-02 19:25:55 UTC ---
Verification using powerpc-linux-gcc-4.4.6 (--host=i686-linux):
Testcase works, it seems this may be fixed. Suggest closing after soon 6 years.
||thalesgroup dot com
--- Comment #10 from Bernhard Kaindl
2012-03-02 19:16:13 UTC ---
Verification using gcc-4.4.6 --target=powerpc-linux --host=i686-linux:
The test case works with -O2, -Os as well as -O3 -no-inline with this
cross-gcc,
but when using -O1, the test
||thalesgroup dot com
--- Comment #31 from Bernhard Kaindl
2012-02-17 11:03:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> A year ago when I opened the bug, it was affecting all branches.
> When it was finally approved (David E.), I re-factored the patch.
>
> At
10 matches
Mail list logo
