[Bug ada/29262] Adding tasking support for arm-linux

2006-10-08 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #6 from belandor at web dot de 2006-10-09 04:13 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Hi, > > s-osinte.ads > This might need a bit more work, some structure size and such might not be > identical between versions. You should look at the s-osinte-linux-alpha.ads &

[Bug ada/29262] Adding tasking support for arm-linux

2006-09-27 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #4 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-28 06:51 --- ...running the above programs give me the following errors/messages: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/testprogs/glibc# ./simple_tasking Alignment trap: simple_tasking (1099) PC=0xa670 Instr=0xe5933000 Address=0x0001 FSR 0x0f3

[Bug ada/29262] Adding tasking support for arm-linux

2006-09-27 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #3 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-28 06:49 --- Created an attachment (id=12347) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12347&action=view) simple_tasking source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29262

[Bug ada/29262] Adding tasking support for arm-linux

2006-09-27 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #2 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-28 06:49 --- Created an attachment (id=12346) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12346&action=view) hello world source code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29262

[Bug ada/29262] Adding tasking support for arm-linux

2006-09-27 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #1 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-28 06:37 --- (In reply to comment #0) actually, the Makefile.in needs modifications. a-numaux-x86.ads does not work for arm (error-message is that only 15 digits are allowed for floating point type), therefore the line + a

[Bug ada/29262] New: Adding tasking support for arm-linux

2006-09-27 Thread belandor at web dot de
I would like to use tasking support for GNAT on an arm-linux target (Intel XSCale PXA 270) to the gcc-4_1-branch The installed runtime library however is using generic dummy package for tasking support (e.g. s-taprop.ads). After having a look at gcc/ada/Makefile.in, I figured there needs to be a c

[Bug ada/29157] gnattools fail on cross compilation - Makefile bug?

2006-09-20 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #4 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-21 04:33 --- okay, aparently something had set the environment options ADA_INCLUDE_PATH and ADA_OBJECT_PATH to the additional paths. That would explain, why stuff went haywire. Is there any place to document this? - Maybe someone else

[Bug ada/29157] gnattools fail on cross compilation - Makefile bug?

2006-09-20 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #3 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-21 03:59 --- my configure line: CC="gcc" /home/ap/colibri/buildroot/toolchain_build_arm/gcc-4.1.1/configure \ --prefix=/home/ap/colibri/buildroot/build_arm/staging_dir \ --build=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug ada/29157] gnattools fail on cross compilation - Makefile bug?

2006-09-20 Thread belandor at web dot de
--- Comment #2 from belandor at web dot de 2006-09-21 03:57 --- it seems, that my RTS_DIR variable is wrong. the Makefile ($BUILDDIR/gnattools/Makefile) extracts or adapts the directory using RTS_DIR:=$(strip $(subst \,/,$(shell gnatls -v | grep adalib ))) right before the rule for

[Bug ada/29157] New: gnattools fail on cross compilation - Makefile bug?

2006-09-20 Thread belandor at web dot de
? Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: belandor at web dot de GCC build triplet: i386-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i386-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-linux-uclibcgnueabi http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29157

[Bug ada/27776] New: GNAT creates bug box when instatiating a 'limited with'ed access type

2006-05-27 Thread belandor at web dot de
MED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: belandor at web dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27776