[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-09-09 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-09-09 14:38 --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00266.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931

[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-09-09 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
-- What|Removed |Added CC||repucul at link dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931

[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-06-25 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-06-25 14:06 --- in the interest of ensuring credit is given to who actually did the work, the above analysis was done by [EMAIL PROTECTED] and posted by me. --bud davis -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-06-25 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-06-25 13:58 --- here are some things i have found while researching this: First, this patch: 2002-05-09 Hassan Aurag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * expr.c (ffeexpr_reduced_ugly2log_): Allow logicals-as-in

[Bug fortran/21931] problem with fugly-logint flag and evaluating if statements

2005-06-10 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-06-10 14:53 --- the behavour of -fugly-logint changed between gcc3.2 and above. which version are you using ? --bud davis -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21931

[Bug libfortran/19303] Unformatted record header is 4-bytes on 32-bit targets

2005-05-30 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-05-31 02:37 --- proposed patch that should fix this problem: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00431.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19303

[Bug libfortran/21621] Inconsistency with binary sequential output

2005-05-30 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From bdavis9659 at comcast dot net 2005-05-31 02:36 --- proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-05/msg00431.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21621

[Bug libfortran/14746] New: [gfortran] F edit descriptor creates wrong field width

2004-03-26 Thread bdavis9659 at comcast dot net
Priority: P2 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bdavis9659 at comcast dot net CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14746