[Bug tree-optimization/113741] missed / wrong optimization switch transformation to same function call

2024-02-03 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113741 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Buschinski --- Ah sorry, I did not know that. Please rephrase the topic to better match the actual problem :) (Or tell me what it should be rephrased to)

[Bug tree-optimization/113741] New: missed / wrong optimization switch transformation to same function call

2024-02-03 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: b.buschinski at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 57308 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57308&action=edit A

[Bug tree-optimization/105740] missed optimization switch transformation for conditions with duplicate conditions

2023-06-25 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105740 --- Comment #12 from Bernd Buschinski --- Hi, according to godbolt (gcc trunk) this is still present. is there anything I can do to help here?

[Bug middle-end/98109] Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

2022-07-31 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 Bernd Buschinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b.buschinski at googlemail dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/105740] New: missed optimization switch transformation for conditions with duplicate conditions

2022-05-26 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: b.buschinski at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 53037 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53037&

[Bug tree-optimization/90387] [9 Regression] __builtin_constant_p and -Warray-bounds warnings

2019-09-10 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90387 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Buschinski --- >From the comments I assumed that the fix is kind of trivial but it is not yet in. Is it realistic that it could be fixed in GCC 9.3? Just asking because we are compiling with -Werror and I wonder if I sh

[Bug c/90387] New: [9 Regression] __builtin_constant_p and -Warray-bounds warnings

2019-05-08 Thread b.buschinski at googlemail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: b.buschinski at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 46314 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46314&action=edit gcc9_constant_array_bound