http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
David Kaufmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
David Kaufmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #9 from David Kaufmann ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #7)
> (In reply to David Kaufmann from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 31320 [details]
> > preprocessor output
> > the buggy function is on line 18136, but it d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #8 from David Kaufmann ---
Created attachment 31323
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31323&action=edit
gdb "backtrace full" when segfaulting
backtrace from gdb when opening xfig with provided testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #6 from David Kaufmann ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Please attach a testcase or at least preprocessed source of w_drawprim.c.
a testcase is the first attachment to this bug with either xfig version 3.2.5b
or 3.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #5 from David Kaufmann ---
Created attachment 31320
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31320&action=edit
preprocessor output
i hope this is the proper preprocessed source, i generated it with the "-E"
parameter.
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #3 from David Kaufmann ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > What is the size of fl ?
>
> What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl?
yes, i am, but if the co
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: astra at ionic dot at
Created attachment 31312
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31312&action=edit
File which triggers the bug by using a specific line drawing style.
With -O1 there is no problem.
With "-O
