--- Comment #1 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2008-01-18 03:57 ---
Bug is invalid: branches in mips16 don't have delay slots. The cause of the
problems I was seeing was found elsewhere. Sorry for the noise...
--
armcc2000 at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Re
Summary: [4.3.0 20080111] mips16 : branch in branch delay slot
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: armcc20
--- Comment #3 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2006-01-18 19:28 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> Kazu, does your patch for PR 23150 apply to 4.0? If so, would you please
> test that change?
I think we've tried that already.
Patch applies to 4.0.2 without problems, but i
--- Comment #9 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2005-11-10 01:25 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
>
> Yes then this is a dup of that bug then. The problem is that the middle-end
> did not know what the target was doing so it rejected sib calling in this
> case.
>
Any ide
--- Comment #7 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2005-11-09 23:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> I think this is a dup of bug 23150 which was fixed in 4.1.0.
>
Something has certainly changed in 4.1 - the stack corruption is gone.
With -Os, the good() and bad() testcases c
--- Comment #5 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2005-11-09 06:21 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think this is a dup of bug 23150 which was fixed in 4.1.0.
>
I don't think so.
I rebuilt 4.0.2 after applying the patch given for bug 23150.
The patched version of 4.0.2 giv
--- Comment #3 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2005-11-09 05:56 ---
Yes, I think you're absolutely correct.
You've also just explained a bug I've been staring at all day ;-) Reading
action->dev_id was causing a segfault and I couldn't understand why r0 and r7
in
Component: inline-asm
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: armcc2000 at yahoo dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-host_pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: arm-9tdmi-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24751
--- Comment #3 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2005-11-09 04:21 ---
A few more results...
1) gcc 4.0.2 _is_ also buggy
2) Bug seems to be associated with -foptimize-sibling-calls
ie previous code compiled with:
arm-linux-gcc-4.0.2 -O1 -foptimize-sibling-calls
gives:
.align
--- Comment #2 from armcc2000 at yahoo dot com 2005-11-09 02:11 ---
Here's a slightly smaller test case:
extern void foo (int f1, int f2, int f3, int f4, int f5, int f6);
void good (int g1, int g2, int g3, int g4, i
10 matches
Mail list logo
