https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
anthonyfk at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #26 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Thank you very much for the fix! I've tried the patch as applied to
gcc-6-branch with an otherwise fresh tarball of gcc 6.3.0. When compiling
lapack-3.6.1 I no longer get the original bug,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
anthonyfk at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.0 |5.1.0
--- Comment #17 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
anthonyfk at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #13 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
I've discovered that the error occurred between 4.9.3 and 5.1.0. I've attached
the .s assembly files for the objects from both of those versions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #12 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37292&action=edit
5.1.0 slamchtst.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #11 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37291
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37291&action=edit
5.1.0 slamch.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #9 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37289
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37289&action=edit
4.9.3 slamchtst.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #10 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37290
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37290&action=edit
5.1.0 lsame.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #7 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37287
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37287&action=edit
4.9.3 lsame.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #8 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37288
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37288&action=edit
4.9.3 slamch.s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #6 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
With the gcc-6-20160103 snapshot the line in lto-symtab.c changes from 143 to
119:
lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_varpool_replace_node, at
lto/lto-symtab.c:119
Please submit a full bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #5 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
I forgot to mention, modifying the compile script in any of the following ways
prevents the ICE from occurring:
1. Compile all sources at same optimization levels.
2. Remove -fprofile-generate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #4 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37261
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37261&action=edit
Source file 3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #3 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37260
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37260&action=edit
Source file 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #2 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37259
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37259&action=edit
Source file 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69188
--- Comment #1 from anthonyfk at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 37258
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37258&action=edit
Script used to reproduce.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anthonyfk at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37257
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37257&action=edit
18 matches
Mail list logo
