https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #17 from aneris ---
Alright, I understand. Thank you again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #15 from aneris ---
(In reply to aneris from comment #14)
> (In reply to aneris from comment #13)
> So I was wondering, is it really out of the question to promote __int128_t to
> an integer type by default like Clang? It'd make so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #14 from aneris ---
(In reply to aneris from comment #13)
> I did some digging and this is because std::is_integral_v<__int128_t> is
> unconditionally true in libc++, unlike in libstdc++ where it's only true
> when the GNU extension
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #13 from aneris ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> tl;dr if you want to compile with strict -std=c++20 -pedantic settings, you
> need to strictly follow the rules of the standard.
I understand, though, at the very
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #9 from aneris ---
Hmm, alright.
Thank you very much for your time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #3 from aneris ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> The difference is int128_t support.
Could you elaborate a bit? I am afraid I don't follow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
--- Comment #5 from aneris ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to aneris from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > > The difference is int128_t support.
> >
> > Could you elaborate a bit? I am
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
aneris changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aneris at disroot dot org
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120305
Bug ID: 120305
Summary: Cannot create a std::vector from a
std::ranges::transform_view.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
