https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51785
andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andyg1001 at hotmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31798
andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andyg1001 at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
--- Comment #3 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-05-04 16:22:21 UTC ---
This ICE still occurs in the release version of gcc 4.7.0.
Here is the output from compiling the attached test-case as is:
$ g++-4.7 -std=c++11 ice.cpp
ice.cpp: In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53166
Bug #: 53166
Summary: static_assert produces bogus warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
--- Comment #2 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-02-24 17:42:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 26743
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26743
test-case for decltype ICE / incorrect evaluation of constexpr
The attached t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
Bug #: 52282
Summary: [C++0x] ICE / confused by earlier errors with
decltype/constexpr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
--- Comment #6 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-01-01 15:25:50 UTC ---
As a suggestion, the test case added in commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=182768 should have the
additional two lines:
constexpr B b1 = A<
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
--- Comment #2 from andyg1001 at hotmail dot co.uk 2012-01-01 13:05:50 UTC ---
I have double-checked and, yes, it does work in the latest revision from trunk
- sorry, I ought to have checked that first.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51723
Bug #: 51723
Summary: [C++0x] delegating constructor ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
