https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117724
--- Comment #8 from Andres Freund ---
FWIW, a few of postgres' CI instances (which intentionally track a snapshot
gcc) are hitting this (see e.g. [1]). I reproduced the failure locally, applied
the patch from [2], after which the build succeeds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110645
Bug ID: 110645
Summary: False positive -Warray-bounds warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110609
--- Comment #2 from Andres Freund ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Dup.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 110546 ***
Are they really the same? This bug happens at -O0 and requires -fPIC and
-fno-semantic-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110609
Bug ID: 110609
Summary: Bogus -Wmismatched-dealloc when allocator defined &
used in same TU w/ -fPIC -fno-semantic-interposition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107224
Bug ID: 107224
Summary: ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106809
Bug ID: 106809
Summary: [12 regression] large bison grammars compilation got a
lot slower, mainly due to -Wuninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106590
--- Comment #1 from Andres Freund ---
Created attachment 53441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53441&action=edit
reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106590
Bug ID: 106590
Summary: x86-64 miscompilation starting with "i386: Improve
ix86_expand_int_movcc" w/ mtune=skylake
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104986
Bug ID: 104986
Summary: [12 Regression] bogus writing 1 byte into a region of
size 0 with -fwrapv and -O2 -fpeel-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100442
--- Comment #4 from Andres Freund ---
> Ending up with an excessive range isn't uncommon in code that freely converts
> between signed and unsigned integers (e.g., by passing an int to a size_t
> argument) and involves conditionals like those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101481
Bug ID: 101481
Summary: -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns can slow down and
increases size of code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100442
--- Comment #2 from Andres Freund ---
Created attachment 50763
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50763&action=edit
preprocessed reproducer
Huh, sorry for that. I thought I had attached it. When I tried again now it
failed due
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100442
Bug ID: 100442
Summary: Spurious -Wstringop-overread error with odd boundaries
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80076
--- Comment #4 from Andres Freund ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> Fixed for GCC 11. Thanks for the report.
Thanks!
14 matches
Mail list logo