--- Comment #7 from andhow at gmail dot com 2009-11-19 02:41 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This is pretty basic C++, by the way.
Mmm hmm. SO basic that it warranted special clarification in 9.4.2-4:
"The member shall still be defined in a namespace scope if it is used in the
--- Comment #4 from andhow at gmail dot com 2009-11-19 01:53 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > You don't have a definition of the static const variable which you need for
> > this to be valid C++.
Heh, oops, hit 'Commit' accidenta
--- Comment #3 from andhow at gmail dot com 2009-11-19 01:52 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> You don't have a definition of the static const variable which you need for
> this to be valid C++.
--
andhow at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from andhow at gmail dot com 2009-07-23 16:31 ---
That is very strange indeed; sorry for the mistake!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40828
ed at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: andhow at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40828
