[Bug libstdc++/31836] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test

2007-05-14 Thread amylaar at spamcop dot net
--- Comment #34 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2007-05-14 19:25 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test Quoting pcarlini at suse dot de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Now, the strange thing is that, before

[Bug libstdc++/31836] [4.3 Regression] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test

2007-05-14 Thread amylaar at spamcop dot net
--- Comment #32 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2007-05-14 16:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] FAIL: 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/12.cc execution test Quoting pcarlini at suse dot de <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > safely when the target doesn'

[Bug rtl-optimization/24194] emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe

2006-07-20 Thread amylaar at spamcop dot net
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2006-07-20 17:57 --- Subject: Re: emit_input_reload_insns secondary reload handling is unsafe Quoting pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug middle-end/25335] [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload leaves insns from earlier passes around: fatal for postinc

2006-07-20 Thread amylaar at spamcop dot net
--- Comment #21 from amylaar at spamcop dot net 2006-07-20 17:08 --- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] reload leaves insns from earlier passes around: fatal for postinc Quoting pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > --- Comment #20 from

[Bug middle-end/16266] [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow

2004-10-06 Thread amylaar at spamcop dot net
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at spamcop dot net 2004-10-07 06:44 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow > > > --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-06 23:19 > --- > I cannot re