[Bug c++/116417] New: SFINAE on std::is_destructible cannot handle destructor of scalar type

2024-08-19 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116417 Bug ID: 116417 Summary: SFINAE on std::is_destructible cannot handle destructor of scalar type Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug target/93022] [ARM, AArch32, NEON] Missing 'vld1_s16_x3' intrinsic

2024-08-01 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93022 Amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amy at amyspark dot me --- Comment #1 from Am

[Bug lto/110710] LTO linker on Windows creates an invalid Makefile

2024-02-12 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710 Amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amy at amyspark dot me --- Comment #6 from A

[Bug tree-optimization/109806] [13/14 Regression] 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs

2024-01-12 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806 Amyspark changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/109806] [13/14 Regression] 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs

2024-01-12 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806 --- Comment #19 from Amyspark --- Working on it. Is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315 the patch you referred to earlier, Richard?

[Bug target/111635] Objects built with -flto cannot be linked with Xcode

2023-10-30 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111635 --- Comment #7 from Amyspark --- I can confirm this is no longer reproducible with macOS Monterey 12.7, Xcode 14.2, and the following linker version: @(#)PROGRAM:ld PROJECT:ld64-820.1 BUILD 20:07:01 Nov 7 2022 configured to support archs: arm

[Bug target/111635] Objects built with -flto cannot be linked with Xcode

2023-10-30 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111635 --- Comment #6 from Amyspark --- I need to recover my GCC installation post Homebrew forcing an OS upgrade to Monterey. Still, I think this needs to be tested against the x64 target -- I've seen some issues only happening when targeting it.

[Bug lto/111635] Objects built with -flto cannot be linked with Xcode

2023-09-28 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111635 --- Comment #1 from Amyspark --- Created attachment 56014 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56014&action=edit Full compiler version

[Bug lto/111635] New: Objects built with -flto cannot be linked with Xcode

2023-09-28 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111635 Bug ID: 111635 Summary: Objects built with -flto cannot be linked with Xcode Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug libstdc++/110016] Possible miscodegen when inlining std::condition_variable::wait predicate causes deadlock

2023-05-28 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110016 --- Comment #2 from Amyspark --- We've seen failures both in Windows (all ABI flavors) and macOS only when compiled with GCC -- AppleClang, Clang, and MSVC (in its three flavors) all work without issue. So I'm doubtful it's a logical issue, espe

[Bug c++/110016] New: [12/13/14] Possible miscodegen when inlining std::condition_variable::wait predicate causes deadlock

2023-05-28 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110016 Bug ID: 110016 Summary: [12/13/14] Possible miscodegen when inlining std::condition_variable::wait predicate causes deadlock Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1

[Bug tree-optimization/109806] [13/14 Regression] 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs

2023-05-11 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806 --- Comment #9 from Amyspark --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > Simple testcase: > ``` > struct basic_string { > ~basic_string() { } > }; > const basic_string data[] = { {} }; > ``` > > This fails with `ulimit -s 1024` which is

[Bug tree-optimization/109806] 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs

2023-05-11 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806 --- Comment #4 from Amyspark --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Likely a duplicate of a bug where ranger runs out of stack on windows > targets. I think you mean bug 109695? If so, it affects GCC 13 as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/109806] 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs

2023-05-11 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806 --- Comment #3 from Amyspark --- Created attachment 55046 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55046&action=edit ZIP copy of the Github gist

[Bug c++/109806] New: 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs

2023-05-10 Thread amy at amyspark dot me via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109806 Bug ID: 109806 Summary: 13.1.0 cc1plus stack smashing crash with C array of complex structs Product: gcc Version: 13.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal