https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056
--- Comment #5 from Alper Ce ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
> (In reply to Alper Ce from comment #3)
> > I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i
> > just used == operator to check value of it.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056
--- Comment #3 from Alper Ce ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
> Where is the bug? Did you read the documentation for operator[]?
I didn't assign anything to my_map(i didn't use assignment operator = ), i just
used == operator to che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84056
--- Comment #1 from Alper Ce ---
output:
a => 1
b => 2
Map after if condition(a new pair ['c':0] inserted in map!):
a => 1
b => 2
c => 0
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: alper.ccc at yandex dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In this example there is a map with 2 pairs ( a:1 and b:2)
but after checking the unavailable vale in if statement (value of c) it inserts
new pair (c:0) to the map:
#include
