https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118647
--- Comment #10 from Alfredo Correa ---
Ok, fair points.
In that case, wouldn't it be more consistent that the `contiguous_iterator`
concept checks for these `noexcept` characteristics?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118647
--- Comment #6 from Alfredo Correa ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Please do attach the testcase that does not use boost instead of just
> linking godbolt too.
The first link, at the top of the OP, doesn't use external code:
h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118647
--- Comment #5 from Alfredo Correa ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Alfredo Correa from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > > The tree level misdetection is recorded as PR 99504.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118647
--- Comment #2 from Alfredo Correa ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> The tree level misdetection is recorded as PR 99504.
ok, I am not an expert, but I have the impression that what I reported is
library problem, not a compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118647
Bug ID: 118647
Summary: Missed optimization to do memcpy/memmove for
contiguous iterator
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
--- Comment #10 from Alfredo Correa ---
Wow, that was fast! Great! (I wasn't optimistic, to be honest.)'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
--- Comment #8 from Alfredo Correa ---
FWIIW, this is the origin of the problem,
https://gitlab.com/correaa/boost-multi#broadcast-infinite-views, implementing
an iterator type that supports stride == 0.
This doesn't form a proper random access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115444
Alfredo Correa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alfredo.correa at gmail dot com
--- Co
