--- Comment #5 from alex at segv dot de 2009-03-19 14:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=17497)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17497&action=view)
Similar code, not sure if same or different bug.
This sample code is closer to our original finding of the bug. N
--- Comment #4 from alex at segv dot de 2009-03-19 13:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17496)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17496&action=view)
Makefile to compile the sample code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39502
--- Comment #3 from alex at segv dot de 2009-03-19 13:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17495)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17495&action=view)
seperate body with code triggering the warning
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39502
--- Comment #2 from alex at segv dot de 2009-03-19 13:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17494)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17494&action=view)
Body to spec
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39502
--- Comment #1 from alex at segv dot de 2009-03-19 13:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17493)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17493&action=view)
spec file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39502
-
Summary: Unexpected uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: alex at segv dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39502
