--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 18:41 ---
Err, I was just going to say that. Curse you Jakub. Let me know when you're
looking at something so we don't duplicate efforts. Wait, am I not supposed to
say curse on a PR? Oh well.
--
http://g
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 15:58 ---
Reproduce with: ./cc1 -g -O a.i -mscore3
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 15:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=20141)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20141&action=view)
reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43437
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 11:36 ---
Fixed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00560.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-16 11:34 ---
Subject: Bug 42917
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 16 11:33:45 2010
New Revision: 157477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157477
Log:
PR tree-optimization/42917
* lambd
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 19:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=20112)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20112&action=view)
gcc.dg/parm-impl-decl-1.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43381
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43381
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-15 14:35 ---
With the last set of patches to var-tracking, this has been fixed. Closing.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 14:29 ---
Increase your stack size.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 17:18 ---
Jakub: Agreed. How can we resolve/close/etc this bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40760
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 14:56 ---
The problem here is a recursive call to gimplify_stmt in gimplify_cond_expr
with the true/false statements. This would only happen on thousands of nested
ifs.
Should this really be a P2? Can't we change this
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 15:18 ---
That's because I hadn't committed. Tests pass. Committing and closing.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 15:18 ---
Subject: Bug 42185
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 15 15:17:46 2009
New Revision: 155256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155256
Log:
PR graphite/42185
* graphite-sese-t
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-14 16:38 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00716.html
Patch fixes both testcases, but the second testcase has another unrelated SSA
bug.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-27 11:19 ---
fixed
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-27 11:18 ---
Subject: Bug 41451
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Oct 27 11:18:12 2009
New Revision: 153588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153588
Log:
PR bootstrap/41451
* fold
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #11 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 00:28 ---
Subject: Bug 40660
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Aug 25 00:27:52 2009
New Revision: 151069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151069
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/40660
* tr
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 18:34 ---
Fixed thusly
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-08/msg01306.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-21 21:11 ---
Sorry I was out on vacation. I will take a look.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40660
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 12:31 ---
This patch fixes the remaining failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00484.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40435
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-17 13:00 ---
Fix for func-ptr-conv-1.c failure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01344.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-13 21:28 ---
Wshadow-3.c and pr36902.c are definitely mine. My original request for
approval indicated that these were problems with fold being location agnostic,
and that I would be addressing the issues post merge. The func
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-09 14:50 ---
Fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00710.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #13 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 15:02 ---
Nope, still can't reproduce with i686-pc-linux-gnu, or with x86-64-linux using
-m32. FWIW, Jakub can't reproduce it either.
Can anyone beside Volker reproduce this? If nobody else can't, I'm in
--- Comment #11 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 14:21 ---
Still can't reproduce. What target are you compiling for?
Verify my steps below, and see if there's any discrepancy in what you are
doing.
anquetil:/build/43/gcc$ ./cc1 --version
GNU C (GCC) version 4.3.
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 14:06 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00778.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 14:05 ---
Subject: Bug 35746
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Aug 12 14:04:18 2008
New Revision: 139018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139018
Log:
PR c/35746
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr)
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 23:23 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I can still reproduce this on the 4.3 branch as of 2008-08-07.
> On mainline the bug disappeared between 2008-07-29 and 2008-08-02.
>
I see the error, but there is no long
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:43 ---
Fixed on mainline, 4.3, and 4.2.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:43 ---
Subject: Bug 35432
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Aug 6 10:41:39 2008
New Revision: 138796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138796
Log:
PR middle-end/35432
* gi
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:32 ---
Subject: Bug 35432
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Aug 6 10:31:22 2008
New Revision: 138794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138794
Log:
PR middle-end/35432
* gi
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:26 ---
Subject: Bug 35432
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Aug 6 10:25:22 2008
New Revision: 138793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138793
Log:
PR middle-end/35432
* gi
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:18 ---
I can no longer reproduce this on either the 4.3 branch or mainline. Volker,
can you check on your end?
If there is no update, I will close at the end of the week.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-06 10:00 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00322.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-05 15:24 ---
I can no longer reproduce this bug on either the 4.3 branch or mainline-- for
both C and C++. If there is no update on this in the next week, I will close
the bug.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 34465
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Jan 4 14:49:28 2008
New Revision: 131323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131323
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34448
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #12 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 14:50 ---
Subject: Bug 34448
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Jan 4 14:49:28 2008
New Revision: 131323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131323
Log:
PR tree-optimization/34448
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-02 14:56 ---
Yes. I submitted a patch which fixed all the related problems, and Diego
wanted some refactoring of the code. I am working on it as we speak. Diego
has said that if the patch is too much of a hassle, the current
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 16:10 ---
Testing a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34448
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 00:12 ---
Gosh, I was going through a similar path, and was horribly depressed at the
code duplication. I'll come up with some abstraction which we can use in both
gimplify_init_ctor and gimplify_modify_expr_rhs. T
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 21:00 ---
Shouldn't that be:
if (valid_const_initializer
&& num_nonzero_elements > 1
&& TREE_READONLY (object)
&& TREE_CODE (object) == VAR_DECL
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-12 23:33 ---
I'll take care of this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #12 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-12 11:18 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00525.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-11 19:04 ---
testing a patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32901
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 23:54 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> E.g. for PR22141 it would help too (for PR32901 only if the constructor
> gimplification heuristics is also adjusted).
>
Ok, I see what you mean. We adjust the heuristi
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 23:43 ---
TER would never see the consecutive initializations because the code I pointed
out in gimplify_init_constructor() keeps the gimplifier from splitting up the
constructor into consecutive MODIFY_EXPRs.
After
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-04 19:30 ---
Ok, here's the deal.
gimplify_init_constructor promotes the constructor to a static because it is a
const aggregate variable, here:
/* If a const aggregate variable is being initialized, th
--- Comment #18 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-03 23:21 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01651.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-29 11:56 ---
I am testing this patch, and will post to gcc-patches when they finish.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33713
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 14:14 ---
This has nothing to do with my patch. When I remove the cse.c patch, the
-ftree-vectorize goes away, so it's probably related to that patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 20:05 ---
Subject: Bug 30375
Author: aldyh
Date: Fri Mar 9 20:05:08 2007
New Revision: 122758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122758
Log:
PR tree-optimization/30375
* tree-s
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 18:50 ---
I believe this is addressed by Roger's patch which was approved yesterday
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00353.html), though I don't think
the final revision has been committed.
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 00:43 ---
I'll look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-06 22:10 ---
Fixed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00425.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-06 14:03 ---
What is the actual triplet, and can you provide a .i file?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30079
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-03 22:32 ---
This still fails because it hasn't been fixed ;-). My patch for
-feliminate-unused-debug-types only handled casts. It needs further front-end
work to handle enums. At least the infrastructure is in place fo
--- Comment #14 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 00:01 ---
> -gstabs+ -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols
This is a different option than -feliminate-unused-debug-types, so I don't see
how this applies.
The patch I wrote was for eliminate-unused-debug-TYPES. I su
--- Comment #12 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 16:14 ---
> No, there are two different options, and the other one is the stabs version
> and not the dwarf2 version.
I'm confused. What options do you feed to the compiler that exhibit the bug,
so I can l
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 16:05 ---
> darwin enables -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols by default.
You mean darwin does NOT enable the option by default, right?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21391
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 15:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Did I mention this fails on powerpc-darwin?
>
How so?
pantani:/build/trunk/clean/gcc$ ./cc1 -quiet -g a.c -gstabs
pantani:/build/trunk/clean/gcc$ grep foo a.s.stabs
"
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 01:38 ---
Patch that fixes the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00380.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21391
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 19:05 ---
I can reproduce the runtime error, but not the compile error.
pantani:/tmp/2$ type gcc
gcc is /tmp/2/bin/gcc
pantani:/tmp/2$ gcc a.c -fopenmp
pantani:/tmp/2$ ./a.out
./a.out: error while loading shared libraries
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 19:20 ---
Subject: Bug 26238
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 7 19:20:32 2006
New Revision: 111818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111818
Log:
PR gomp/26238
* doc/passes.texi (Tree-SS
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 21:56 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01706.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 21:53 ---
Mine
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 21:53 ---
Subject: Bug 26234
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Feb 21 21:53:21 2006
New Revision: 111345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111345
Log:
PR libgomp/26234
* doc/inst
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 22:18 ---
Mine
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #10 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 11:38 ---
fixed on 4.1 branch as well
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 11:37 ---
Subject: Bug 24138
Author: aldyh
Date: Wed Dec 7 11:37:53 2005
New Revision: 108157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108157
Log:
PR C++/24138
* tree.c (integer_all_onesp)
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 19:48 ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01175.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-06 19:45 ---
Subject: Bug 24138
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Dec 6 19:45:00 2005
New Revision: 108126
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108126
Log:
PR C++/24138
* tree.c (integer_a
--- Comment #8 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 21:15 ---
See previous comment.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-17 21:12 ---
We used to allow this, but have now made the warning stricter. This behavior
was done deliberately. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg00275.html
As is explained in the thread, you can modify the
--- Comment #3 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 20:54 ---
What the heck...death by dwarf. I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 20:10 ---
I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 02:01 ---
I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #5 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 20:25 ---
I'll take a look at this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #25 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 21:16 ---
Bonzini:
Perhaps both approaches would be even better. We definitely should handle the
transformed vector, because theoretically it's still easy to generate. And
adding the extra check you mention would be
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24230
--- Comment #21 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 20:08 ---
Does anyone have the un-preprocessed source for this bug? I'm seeing some
assignments that should have casts, and I wan't to rule out bogus input.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24230
--- Comment #2 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 12:52 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01718.html
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 12:48 ---
I'll take this.
--
aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #1 from aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 12:43 ---
Subject: Bug 24505
Author: aldyh
Date: Mon Oct 31 12:43:44 2005
New Revision: 106269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=106269
Log:
PR gomp/24505
* c-omp.c (c_finish
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-11 14:42
---
I have just backported to the 4.0 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10611
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-19 17:22
---
Fixed with patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg01630.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From aldyh at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-11 00:20
---
Fixed on mainline. Backported to 3.4. 4.0 patch will be committed once the
branch is opened.
--
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
