[Bug c++/109745] Incorrect code generated with -O1 when having a constexpr object modifying a mutable member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109745 albin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||albin at yahoo dot com --- Comment #2 from albi

[Bug c++/109344] feraiseexcept produces incorrect code when optimizations are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109344 --- Comment #4 from albin --- Thanks for the info. If it was fixed three years ago how come it is still seen when using gcc (trunk) on Compiler Explorer? Is Compiler Explorer using an obsolete glibc?

[Bug c++/109344] New: feraiseexcept produces incorrect code when optimizations are enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109344 Bug ID: 109344 Summary: feraiseexcept produces incorrect code when optimizations are enabled Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/102942] New: Implicit copy constructor not elided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102942 Bug ID: 102942 Summary: Implicit copy constructor not elided Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other