https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
--- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo ---
I don't know if I was able to provide the concept, but in other words if we
know that something like -fstack-clash-protection is widely used nowadays, it
make no sense rebase patches for 10 years and then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Bug ID: 112897
Summary: Have a configure option for all common flags used by
default on distros
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112635
Agostino Sarubbo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112635
--- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Yep, GCC fixes the code for you by eliding 'buf'. That's perfectly OK though
> since the code invokes undefined behavior.
>
> I'm inclined to close this as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112635
Bug ID: 112635
Summary: stack smash protection does not work when code is
compiled with -O
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112589
Bug ID: 112589
Summary: man gcc does not specify the default behavior of
-fcf-protection when used without arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED