https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579
AbigailBuccaneer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82738
Bug 82738 depends on bug 89579, which changed state.
Bug 89579 Summary: -Wclobbered warning false positive when compiling with -Og
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89579
What|Removed |Added
-
-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abigail.buccaneer at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 45884
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45884&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85049
--- Comment #1 from AbigailBuccaneer ---
If `index_sequence_for` is replaced with `std::index_sequence_for` (and
`#include ` is added), this code compiles fine under g++-7, but not
g++-8 (where std::index_sequence_for is implemented in terms of _
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abigail.buccaneer at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following code:
template struct index_sequence {};
template using index_sequence_for =
index_sequence<__integer_pack(sizeof...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84110
--- Comment #1 from AbigailBuccaneer ---
From what I can tell, this isn't intentional behavior in libstdc++.
regex_scanner.h defines:
const char* _M_ecma_spec_char = "^$\\.*+?()[]{}|";
and regex_scanner.tcc tries to interpret any character
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abigail.buccaneer at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following code, when compiled with libstdc++:
#include
int main() {
auto r = std::regex{"\0", std::size_t{1}};
}
...results in std::regex_error be
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abigail.buccaneer at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following code compiles fine (with -std=c++14):
struct A {
union {
ion: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: abigail.buccaneer at gmail dot com
The following code compiles in Clang 3.3, but not