[Bug fortran/119812] New: Bogus rank and type mismatch errors with procedure pointer

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code causes bogus errors when compiled with the latest trunk using the -Wall option: module bugMod type :: c

[Bug fortran/110626] [13/14/15 regression] Duplicated finalization in derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110626 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Benson --- Thanks Paul. I'm always happy to be patient - I appreciate the huge amount of work you put in to gfortran (and the many different priorities within that work).

[Bug fortran/119802] New: Defined assignment not called for component of derived type

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- A type-bound assignment of an allocatable component of a derived type is not called if the parent type does not use type-bound

[Bug fortran/109066] Segfault when using defined assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109066 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Benson --- With apologies for the long delay in replying - thanks for pointing out that I had the result of a constructor undefined. In this updated example I think that constructor results are now correctly defined, b

[Bug fortran/114535] [13/14 regression] ICE with elemental finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114535 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Benson --- Thanks Paul. The workaround is very helpful and lets me continue making progress in the rest of my work for now. Thanks again!

[Bug fortran/114535] New: ICE with elemental finalizer

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code (which must be in two files to trigger the error) causes an ICE using the latest gfortran. $ cat ice1.F90 module iv type, public :: vs contains final

[Bug fortran/110548] New: Segfault with optional argument and OpenMP tasks

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following shows a segfault at run time resulting from use of an optional argument in a function with OpenMP tasks: module taskerMod type :: helper end

[Bug fortran/110547] New: Improper finalization calls with OpenMP tasks

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Here's an example code (highly simplified from the actual code I'm working on) that causes seemingly wrong behavior resulting in calling a destructor when it

[Bug fortran/109066] New: Segfault when using defined assignment

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code (compiled using current trunk), when run, causes a segfault, and valgrind complains about an invalid read. The code appears correct to me, and runs

[Bug fortran/105807] ICE / error when defining a class containing polymorphic components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105807 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Benson --- A possibly related case: module tm type :: st end type st type :: resourceManager class (*), pointer :: resource => null() integer , pointer :: counter => null() end type resourceMan

[Bug fortran/102845] New: Memory leak with nested OpenMP parallelism

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code seems to cause a memory leak when using nested OpenMP parallelism when compiled and run with gfortran-12. module nestedMod type :: n integer

[Bug fortran/93473] ICE on valid with long module + submodule names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93473 Andrew Benson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96122] Segfault when using finalizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96122 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Benson --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Confirmed. For me it segfaults from GCC7 up to GCC11. Interesting. This started occurring for me when I updated from GCC10.1 to 11. But, the code I posted

[Bug fortran/96122] New: Segfault when using finalizer

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code segfaults with gfortran 11.0.0: module a type vs character(len=1), dimension(:), allocatable :: ch contains final :: vsf end type vs type mtd

[Bug fortran/94446] New: Bogus "type mismatch" with TYPE(c_ptr) and sizeof()

iority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following causes a bogus "type mismatch" error with the current trunk (e899d4b71255b9ae096a7ecd31a61fc76f200019): $ cat file1.F90 module

[Bug fortran/93486] ICE on valid with nested submodules and long submodule names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93486 Andrew Benson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/83113] Bogus "duplicate allocatable attribute" error for submodule character function

||abensonca at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Andrew Benson --- Fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7848054c68bad6e2aa40cb59f77cc99bd8448d52

[Bug fortran/89943] Submodule functions are not allowed to have C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89943 Bug 89943 depends on bug 83113, which changed state. Bug 83113 Summary: Bogus "duplicate allocatable attribute" error for submodule character function https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83113 What|Removed