nt: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45333
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45332
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45331
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45330
ED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45329
--- Comment #10 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-02 19:13 ---
There were problems with my original patch (Sadly, I don't recall the
details.). I haven't looked at this in a while and am unlikely to do so soon.
If someone else wants to look at this, please feel fre
--- Comment #9 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 09:08 ---
Fixed by revision 130554.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-01 08:57 ---
Subject: Bug 8171
Author: aaw
Date: Sat Dec 1 08:56:55 2007
New Revision: 130554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130554
Log:
PR c++/8171
gcc/cp/
*
--- Comment #5 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-30 10:43 ---
Should this bug be marked as resolved, then?
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 06:26 ---
Fixed by change 127600.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 21:42 ---
Subject: Bug 31749
Author: aaw
Date: Fri Aug 17 21:42:38 2007
New Revision: 127600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127600
Log:
PR c++/31749
gcc/cp/
* name-
--- Comment #6 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 23:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=14030)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14030&action=view)
Fix for PR 31749.
This patches fixes this PR and includes some ambiguous decl cleanup as well.
Submission
--- Comment #5 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 21:24 ---
No segfault, but it does give an "is already declared in this scope" error.
Contrary to the claim in the initial bug submission, this is valid code.
>From paragraph 10, section 7.3.3 of the C++ stand
--- Comment #6 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 22:32 ---
I've just run into this problem trying to test an unrelated change.
Here's a puzzler, though. If I run the g++.dg/rtti/repo1.C test, it compiles
successfully. If I copy the command line for the compilation
--- Comment #4 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 21:18 ---
I've got a fix to this as part of my using directive / using declaration
cleanup. I'll disentangle this from the rest of my changes and submit a patch
soonish.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot o
--- Comment #4 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 01:19 ---
*** Bug 2708 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 01:19 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30734 ***
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 01:16 ---
Resolved by r124960 (cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01182.html).
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 22:41 ---
Assigning to myself since I now have write access to Bugzilla.
--
aaw at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
19 matches
Mail list logo
