[Bug target/69660] New: Microblaze break_handler and symbol `_interrupt_handler' is already defined

2016-02-03 Thread a_fisch at gmx dot de
erity: minor Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: a_fisch at gmx dot de Target Milestone: --- Hi all, I tried to implement some low level routines for the microblaze target and used some rarely used features o

[Bug c/31072] Wrong code for volatile var with initalization and optimization

2007-03-07 Thread a_fisch at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from a_fisch at gmx dot de 2007-03-07 17:43 --- Subject: Re: Wrong code for volatile var with initalization and optimization My runtime environment is clearing .bss but the problem is that the initialization value is != 0 . Because of the value != 0 it'

[Bug c/31072] Wrong code for volatile var with initalization and optimization

2007-03-07 Thread a_fisch at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from a_fisch at gmx dot de 2007-03-07 15:44 --- Created an attachment (id=13163) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13163&action=view) Generated assembler output: powerpc-elf-gcc -O1 -S -o fg_O1.s fg.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug c/31072] Wrong code for volatile var with initalization and optimization

2007-03-07 Thread a_fisch at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from a_fisch at gmx dot de 2007-03-07 15:41 --- Created an attachment (id=13162) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13162&action=view) Preprocessed source of code sample -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31072

[Bug c/31072] New: Wrong code for volatile var with initalization and optimization

2007-03-07 Thread a_fisch at gmx dot de
optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: a_fisch at gmx dot de GCC build triplet: mingw32

[Bug target/16343] invalid code when using -meabi -msdata=eabi

2004-11-12 Thread a_fisch at gmx dot de
--- Additional Comments From a_fisch at gmx dot de 2004-11-12 19:20 --- The Bug is in gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c in function rs6000_elf_in_small_data_p() With gcc version 3.4.x? (2003-05-02) the macro SYMBOL_REF_SMALL_P () was introduced, which checks for a flag, which is not