[Bug c++/114675] New: warning for "reference to not fully constructed object"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114675 Bug ID: 114675 Summary: warning for "reference to not fully constructed object" Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/113981] New: risc-v: non-void C++ function with no return statement has no ret

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113981 Bug ID: 113981 Summary: risc-v: non-void C++ function with no return statement has no ret Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/113980] New: risc-v: unnecessary sign-extend after lw, and more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113980 Bug ID: 113980 Summary: risc-v: unnecessary sign-extend after lw, and more Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug target/111704] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 on aarch64-linux-gnu during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111704 Bug ID: 111704 Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 on aarch64-linux-gnu during RTL pass: cprop_hardreg Product: gcc Version: 12.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/109930] transform atomic exchange to unconditional store when old value is unused?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109930 --- Comment #5 from Simon Richter --- > Btw if you know the old state then there is presumably no concurrent access > here and so you don't need atomic, let alone sequential consistency. I know it in some, but not all cases. Basically, what I

[Bug rtl-optimization/109930] transform atomic exchange to unconditional store when old value is unused?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109930 --- Comment #3 from Simon Richter --- I was looking at ARMv7 initially. If I understood the implementation correctly, this can be a generic optimization.

[Bug rtl-optimization/109930] New: transform atomic exchange to unconditional store when old value is unused?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109930 Bug ID: 109930 Summary: transform atomic exchange to unconditional store when old value is unused? Product: gcc Version: 13.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n