https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #29 from Peter Sewell ---
On 8 May 2018 at 08:22, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
>
> --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #22)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76774
--- Comment #4 from Peter Sewell ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> What code were you expecting anyways?
I hadn't noticed how recent the other-size LL/SC were. But then I would have
expected a 4-byte representation for _Atomic(_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76774
--- Comment #1 from Peter Sewell ---
Created attachment 39439
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39439&action=edit
example code
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Peter.Sewell at cl dot cam.ac.uk
Target Milestone: ---
On a POWER 7 machine using GCC 4.9.1, something declared as an _Atomic
iority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Peter.Sewell at cl dot cam.ac.uk
Created attachment 32934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32934&action=edit
C code as pasted into bug report
The following code can produce a pointe
