--- Comment #8 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-06-24 17:13
---
Thanks.
Were only the test cases affected?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36616
*** [do-check] Fehler 2
--
Summary: Open issues from a test run
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-02-17 17:17
---
I am curious on improvements for unambiguous error reporting with variable and
member names.
--
Markus dot Elfring at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-02-17 16:11
---
It was hard for me to spot the updated variables "stat_delimiter" and
"call_id_string" as the error reasons.
It would be nice if the GCC implementation will be even more precise than the
--- Comment #4 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-02-17 15:52
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The problem is here:
> sipp.cpp(137): error: a value of type "const char *const *" cannot be used to
> initialize an entity of type "void *"
>{&qu
--- Comment #2 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-02-17 14:03
---
Created an attachment (id=15176)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15176&action=view)
update candidates
I am surprised how the global variable "options_table" is affected
--- Comment #1 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2008-02-17 13:55
---
Created an attachment (id=15175)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15175&action=view)
preprocessed source file
I can circumvent the mentioned error messages if I partly deactivate th
messages about invalid pointer
conversions at end of array initialisation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu do
--- Comment #2 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-20 20:33
---
Why is it a "bad" idea to add more than the description
"--enable-languages=LIST specify which front-ends to build" to the top-level
configuration script?
--
Markus dot Elfring a
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Markus dot Elfring at web dot de
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triple
--- Comment #4 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-20 09:48
---
I do not need to get informed here about useless targets for the selected
language. I find an explicit warning even more confusing in this case.
--
Markus dot Elfring at web dot de changed:
What
--- Comment #4 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-20 09:43
---
The warning confuses me a bit. I do not not need its information if I should
ignore it.
--
Markus dot Elfring at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-20 09:03
---
The design is not clear as it seems for you:
Are these targets needed for Ada?
Why is there a warning if unsupported targets will be excluded?
--
Markus dot Elfring at web dot de changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-20 08:55
---
I do not want the Ada targets and corresponding configuration checks in this
use case if I exclude Ada from the language selection.
--
Markus dot Elfring at web dot de changed:
What|Removed
ignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Markus dot Elfring at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33827
ion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Markus dot Elfring at web dot de
GCC host triplet: Linux So
ac?revision=129122&view=markup
--
Summary: Improve configuration documentation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-19 20:54
---
By the way: There is another report on this specific issue with the topic "make
check on -CURRENT in lang/gnat-gcc41" by Petr Holub.
http://groups.google.de/group/mailing.freebsd.ports/msg/0aeb2c
--- Comment #1 from Markus dot Elfring at web dot de 2007-10-19 20:41
---
I hope that the rest of my test result is fine, isn't it?
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes42098
# of expected failures 127
# of unresolved testcases 1
g
ReportedBy: Markus dot Elfring at web dot de
GCC build triplet: Linux Sonne 2.6.22.9-0.4-default #1 SMP 2007/10/05
21:32:04 UTC
GCC host triplet: Linux Sonne 2.6.22.9-0.4-default #1 SMP 2007/10/05
21:32:04 UTC
GCC target triplet: Linux Sonne 2.6
20 matches
Mail list logo
