[Bug target/110011] -mfull-toc (-mfp-in-toc) yields incorrect _Float128 constants on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110011 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95987] Another ice during GIMPLE pass: slp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95987 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-30 Assignee|unassigne

[Bug libstdc++/95990] New: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95990 Bug ID: 95990 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: RESOLVED Severity:

[Bug target/70053] Returning a struct of _Decimal128 values generates extraneous stores and loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70053 Jiu Fu Guo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/95991] New: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95991 Bug ID: 95991 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: RESOLVED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/61638] "warning: multi-line comment" unclear and has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61638 --- Comment #12 from Jack Adrian Zappa --- Is it possible that 2. If a line comment end in an \ but the next line is a comment, then do the same thing as is done for a multi-line comment, ignore it as not an issue. Could be done. I

[Bug c++/99479] [modules] ICE Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/95637] Read-only data assigned to `.sdata' rather than `.rodata'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95637 --- Comment #6 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Thanks WRT Ada clarification. Otherwise I don't think there's anything stopping a language definition from requiring an attempt to modify read-only data to be trapped as an exceptional condition, leaving