Re: [Bug driver/81358] libatomic not automatically linked with C11 code

2019-09-16 Thread Joseph Myers
I should also note the testsuite point I mentioned in the BoF, and related points about building target libraries, which mean this is more complicated than just the driver specs change: There is testsuite logic (see gcc/testsuite/lib/atomic-dg.exp) to locate libatomic for build-tree testing and

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-16 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, NightStrike wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 08/14/2017 04:22 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > >> > >> I'm emailing this manually to the list because Bugzilla is down and I > >> can't file a bug on Bugzilla about Bugzilla being down. The error >

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-16 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017, Eric Gallager wrote: > I see Richi redid all his 7.2 release changes; does that imply that > the server restore is now complete? No, there's still a search process ongoing to identify corrupted or missing files by comparison with the last backup. My expectation is that all

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > On 08/15/2017 10:27 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > > > > > It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840 > > > was created Sunday afternoon but is not in t

Re: [Bug web/?????] New: Fwd: failure notice: Bugzilla down.

2017-08-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017, Martin Sebor wrote: > It looks like the data loss extends beyond 8/14. Bug 81840 > was created Sunday afternoon but is not in the database: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01303.html > > (Strangely, 81841 is there, as is 81839.) That's another 81839 replac

Re: [Bug c/80730] bogus initializer element is not computable at load time converting a string to bool

2017-05-15 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 15 May 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80730 > > --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- > I"m not sure I understand what you're saying. Your comment that "the > initializer *as > converted* must be a constant expression (and, thus, to

Re: ia64-elf and i386-elf fail to build

2016-08-25 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Nick Clifton wrote: > gcc/ChangeLog > 2016-08-25 Nick Clifton > > * config/ia64/ia64.c (ia64_init_builtins): Initialise the > float128_type_node if that has not been done already. > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_init_builtin_types): Likewise. No, this is wr

Re: ia64-elf and i386-elf fail to build

2016-08-25 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Joseph Myers wrote: > _Float128). Though preferable would be to fix all the targets with > IX86_NO_LIBGCC_TFMODE / IX86_MAYBE_NO_LIBGCC_TFMODE / > IA64_NO_LIBGCC_TFMODE so that they include the relevant support code in > libgcc and so no lon

Re: ia64-elf and i386-elf fail to build

2016-08-25 Thread Joseph Myers
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016, Nick Clifton wrote: > The cause appears to be an attempt to register a builtin type using > the float128_type_node, which is NULL for these particular targets: > > gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c:10373 > gcc/config/i386/i386.c:33347 > > Presumably float128_type_node sho

other/928: Out of date preprocessor docs in extend.texi

2000-11-29 Thread Joseph Myers
>Number: 928 >Category: other >Synopsis: Out of date preprocessor docs in extend.texi >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible:unassigned >State: open >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Wed Nov