[Bug libfortran/35063] [Regression wrt g77] I/O leaks handles/memory on Windows XP

2008-02-07 Thread Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov
--- Comment #19 from Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov 2008-02-07 15:54 --- Writing to an internal unit is nothing more than a fancy (formatted) assignment. Each thread allocates its own unit structure. Its not like file I/O where threads are accessing a common shared resource. I should

[Bug libfortran/35063] I/O leaks handles/memory on Windows XP

2008-02-06 Thread Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov
--- Comment #10 from Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov 2008-02-06 20:25 --- Reply to comment #9: This is a very important observation. I have checked the code and we have code that free's the internal unit (free_internal_unit) and I have confirmed that it is called correctly after

[Bug fortran/34828] ICE: GNU MP: Cannot reallocate memory for gfortran.dg/parameter_array_init_3.f90

2008-01-30 Thread Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov
--- Comment #14 from Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov 2008-01-30 18:04 --- The pr19925 segfault is close by the segfault here but not the same. I am working on a patch for that one. What is becoming clear is that we are not handling expansion of constructors very well yet. Also, I will

[Bug fortran/19925] Implied do-loop in an initialization expression is broken

2008-01-29 Thread Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov
--- Comment #16 from Jerry_V_DeLisle at rl dot gov 2008-01-29 15:29 --- The segfault here is the same segfault I reported in 34828 yesterday. I have a patch all ready for that part. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19925