[Bug middle-end/28045] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-19 Thread Jerry dot James at usu dot edu
--- Comment #8 from Jerry dot James at usu dot edu 2006-06-19 16:27 --- On behalf of the XEmacs team, I thank you for your amazingly speedy attention to this bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28045

[Bug c/28045] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-17 Thread Jerry dot James at usu dot edu
--- Comment #3 from Jerry dot James at usu dot edu 2006-06-17 21:05 --- I can confirm that both the mainline and the current 4.1 branch compile the testcase correctly. Nevertheless, both the current 4.1 branch and the mainline (revision 114741) are still miscompiling XEmacs when any

[Bug c/28045] Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-17 Thread Jerry dot James at usu dot edu
--- Comment #2 from Jerry dot James at usu dot edu 2006-06-17 21:04 --- Created an attachment (id=11688) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11688&action=view) Testcase showing an optimizaton bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28045

[Bug c/28045] New: Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation

2006-06-15 Thread Jerry dot James at usu dot edu
mary: Bitfield, &&, and optimization => bad code generation Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: Jerry dot J