http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52745
Jonathan Rogers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52745
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Rogers
2012-03-27 23:25:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Otherwise, if the move constructor by chance throws, the push_back cannot have
> no effects, as required by 23.2.1/10. Actually the requirement holds for a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52745
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Rogers
2012-03-27 23:13:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> But Stuff' move-constructor isn't known not to throw...
Okay, so it is a new requirement for move constructors to be marked as nothrow
in order for vector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52745
Bug #: 52745
Summary: GCC4.7 vector uses copy instead of move constructor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
