--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-10-10 11:38 ---
I agree code is invalid Fortran and should be rejected [though it can be made
valid quite easily by supplying the missing type].
Works fine on both 4.3 and 4.3.1 on this machine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gn
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-07-14 11:34 ---
-ffast-math also enables other (even more unsafe?) optimizations which may not
be desirable.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36821
program
--
Summary: ICE on size with kind parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
Repor
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-04-17 09:33 ---
That seems to fix the original complaint with the following output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/bugs/gfortran-4.3/ls_prec $ gfortran-4.3 -Wall -pedantic
-Wconversion -o test test.f90
test.f90:10.20:
lvar = 2_long**33
nversions
in fortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
GCC
an
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35945
"Line 33", &
array(34), &
"Line 35", &
array(36), &
"Line 37", &
array(38), &
"Line 39", &
array(40), &
"Line 41", &
array(42), &
"Line 43"
end progr
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-04-01 14:13 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for the report; the internal compiler error is definitely a compiler
> bug. However, I believe the program is invalid.
I know the program is invalid (thought that went w
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
11 matches
Mail list logo