--- Additional Comments From Hu dot YuehWei at gmail dot com 2005-03-20
07:59 ---
so the "... = 3;" initialization statement below is a definition or a
declaration?
According to the C++ standard, its a definition.
Should the compiler allocate a memory space for it?
struct T
--- Additional Comments From Hu dot YuehWei at gmail dot com 2005-03-19
18:25 ---
I see.
But why compiler doesn't also make a temporary variable for the constant defined
in a class scope?
Such as following codes:
struct T
{
static int const a = 3;
};
void
fff(int const &a)
--- Additional Comments From Hu dot YuehWei at gmail dot com 2005-03-19
14:15 ---
I understand what you mean.
But why the following codes works:
#include
#include
struct T
{
static char const a = 3;
};
std::vector ddd;
int
main()
{
ddd.push_back(static_cast(T::a
--- Additional Comments From Hu dot YuehWei at gmail dot com 2005-03-19
14:01 ---
#include
struct T
{
static char const a = 3;
};
void
fff(char a)
{
}
std::vector b;
int
main()
{
fff(T::a); /* this line of codes is fine. */
b.push_back(T::a); /* however, this line of codes
--- Additional Comments From Hu dot YuehWei at gmail dot com 2005-03-19
13:53 ---
But according the standard, 'const static' data members of an intergral type can
now be initialized _inside_ their class. In this case, the initialization is
_also_ a definition, so _n
undefined reference to "static const" fields of classes
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy:
