https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118328
--- Comment #22 from Diego Russo ---
Another reason to have this implemented is the CPython JIT. It is a template
(stencil) JIT where every micro OP is precompiled as stencil. At run time these
stencils will be stitched together and patched with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118328
--- Comment #19 from Diego Russo ---
> Can you make a simple table:
w/o tail-call - 1
with tail-call but not preserve_none - 0.94
with tail-call and preserve_none - 1
You understood correctly.
I think there is st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118328
--- Comment #16 from Diego Russo ---
Right, I had a couple of problems with running the benchmarks. A few failures
and the wrong environment variable to select the binary of the compiler.
Anyway I re-ran the benchmarks and the binary without pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118328
--- Comment #15 from Diego Russo ---
Folks, I think I've botched the performance measurement. Need to retake the
measurement. Give me some time and I'll come back with the right results.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118328
Diego Russo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Diego.Russo at arm dot com
--- Comment #1
