https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56106
Alexander Voigt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Alexander.Voigt at desy dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Voigt ---
I absolutely agree, that the definition of the std::conj() overloads in C++11
is problematic. However, in my opinion one has to be strict when implementing
the standard. Otherwise, people might accidental
: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Alexander.Voigt at desy dot de
Target Milestone: ---
Host: GNU/Linux x86_64
Target: GNU/Linux x86_64
Created attachment 38229
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38
