https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
--- Comment #5 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
Thank you for your response. Naturally, I anticipated that the issue might be
with the s390x architecture cross-compiler. However, unexpectedly, I was
unaware that qemu was gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112998
Bug ID: 112998
Summary: s390x: Incorrect code generation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112996
Bug ID: 112996
Summary: Improperly evaluated value of the s390x conditional
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112986
Bug ID: 112986
Summary: s390x gcc O2, O3: Incorrect logic operation in <
comparison with the same values
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #9 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
```
#include
#define M_1 0xad5d6da /* 1010110101011101011011011010 */
char g_1 = -1;
short g_2 = -1;
char v1 = -1;
short v2 = 1;
int main(){
char l_1 = -1;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #8 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
I'm sorry, I also didn't fully understand these bugs, my friend.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112329
Bug ID: 112329
Summary: Faulty arithmetic comparison in O2, O3 of s390x-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #6 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
```
z3rodae0@z3rodae0:~$ ./sh.sh
result for -O0 "signed" = 1
result for -O1 "signed" = 1
result for -O2 "signed" = 1
result for -O3 "signed" = 1
result for -O0 "unsigned" = 0
re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112274
Bug ID: 112274
Summary: Bug due to unused expressions on s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #4 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
>From your perspective, do you think this could be a compiler bug? When tested
with various compiler options following the GCC bug reporting guidelines, the
binary compiles with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
--- Comment #1 from 김대영 <22s302h0659 at sonline20 dot sen.go.kr> ---
Created attachment 56320
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56320&action=edit
bug_Poc Codes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112112
Bug ID: 112112
Summary: Improper Arithmetic Type Conversion in
s390x-linux-gnu-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112111
Bug ID: 112111
Summary: Improper Arithmetic Type Conversion in
s390x-linux-gnu-gcc
Product: gcc
Version: 11.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
13 matches
Mail list logo
