https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.1.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122196
Bug ID: 122196
Summary: template function that starts with __builtin_ causes
an ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30102
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-08-28 00:00:00 |2025-10-7
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20)
> (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #16)
> > So, is this too ugly? (Please ignore the whitespace change.)
> >
> > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122201
Bug ID: 122201
Summary: Missing removal of a load due to not doing
reassociation with signed integers
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121979
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
P.S. the libstdc++ mailing list is a better place to discuss the implementation
than here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122200
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122200
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
```
#0 wide_int_storage::get_precision (this=, this=) at
/usr/src/debug/sys-devel/gcc-16.0./gcc-16.0./gcc/wide-int.h:1254
#1 wi::int_traits >::get_precision (x=...,
x=...) at
/usr/src/debug/sys-devel/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122200
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122199
ellxor at proton dot me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88727
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers ---
Since C2y allows this construct, this is now a quality-of-implementation issue
only for older standard versions and for -Wc23-c2y-compat.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122199
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to ellxor from comment #1)
> Was going to submit this earlier in the day and didn't see that this issue
> had been submitted later after finding it.
It is fine; it happens. Especially when it is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107187
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ABI, patch
--- Comment #2 from Sam James -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88727
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84b4687eb44c22db5ee5a71cb665ec7110d7
commit r16-4277-g84b4687eb44c22db5ee5a71cb665ec7110d7
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26581
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84b4687eb44c22db5ee5a71cb665ec7110d7
commit r16-4277-g84b4687eb44c22db5ee5a71cb665ec7110d7
Author: Joseph Myers
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||99098
Keywords|
d
gcc version 16.0.0 20251007 (experimental)
d3e963d1ccc3500654bec4e2ac94360e864ed343 (Gentoo Hardened 16.0. p, commit
ead9249ea8caed8815234a0b4fbc54382819b906)
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122199
Bug ID: 122199
Summary: Extern C allowed with Abbreviated function template
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dcf3410a743867a0744d3a3d737b2e0b9c035ac
commit r16-4276-g3dcf3410a743867a0744d3a3d737b2e0b9c035ac
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sat Aug 30 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122198
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
So what is happening is var_N initial is being looked into and then repeating
for var_(N-1) as it points upwards.
The question is why is var_N is being looked at first rather than var_0 which
will short cir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[16 Regression] |[16 Regression]
|pred
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122198
Bug ID: 122198
Summary: gcc ICEs on large files without specifics
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122195
Bug ID: 122195
Summary: No gdb pretty printer for flat_map
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122193
Bug ID: 122193
Summary: MIssing optimization for branches that differ on a
constant
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122196
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
extern "C" {
template void bar(T) {}
void foo () {
bar(1);
bar('X');
}
}
is rejected nicely though, with error: template with C linkage
And so is
template void main(T) {}
void foo () {
main(1);
main(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122168
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0bb897ac9fd455124dc7e592655afbd933445e63
commit r14-12057-g0bb897ac9fd455124dc7e592655afbd933445e63
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #16 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
So, is this too ugly? (Please ignore the whitespace change.)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
index 0c6df64b921f..cd8be8b091fe 100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122192
Bug ID: 122192
Summary: Lookup for a dependent nested type as a base-specifier
should be type-only
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f933d1d4014396f901a2d4f25d41894b537f531b
commit r14-12059-gf933d1d4014396f901a2d4f25d41894b537f531b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122192
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reading the commit message for r13-6098-g46711ff8e60d64b7e5550f (the change
most likely which introduced the difference), makes me think GCC 13+ is correct
here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122124
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Blocks|120763
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121845
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I've pushed Robin's patch to the trunk. What I don't know is whether or not
this likely affects gcc-15, in which case we should add the regressinon marker
and backport in a week or so.
Robin, any sense of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122194
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks to be fixed on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122160
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #19 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #17)
> FWIW, a patch constructed from comments #2, #3 and the fixup in comment #16
> yields two regressions at r16-4259-g9242a89d088f44 for cris-elf compare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121845
--- Comment #4 from Robin Dapp ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3)
> I've pushed Robin's patch to the trunk. What I don't know is whether or not
> this likely affects gcc-15, in which case we should add the regressinon
> marker and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122193
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gulackeg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122187
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122190
Bug ID: 122190
Summary: AArch64 fmv version priority rules are wrong
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122131
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So we have a gather-scatter stmt here, using VMAT_GATHER_SCATTER_EMULATED
and dr_explicit_realign_optimized alignment scheme. We should not have
chosen that for gather-scatter (it does not make sense).
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #18 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
*churn of _new_ tests, passing and failing
(otherwise that statement would have been quite meaningless: "yeah some tests
passed and some failed, like they do" :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
FWIW, a patch constructed from comments #2, #3 and the fixup in comment #16
yields two regressions at r16-4259-g9242a89d088f44 for cris-elf compared to
r16-3809-g46028a2f40329b (not counting the usual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122187
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3cbd43d640d6384df85c171a0245488f0adc3145
commit r16-4273-g3cbd43d640d6384df85c171a0245488f0adc3145
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121845
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:62631c39a788161ff2f686adf355d10443e0d899
commit r16-4271-g62631c39a788161ff2f686adf355d10443e0d899
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Tue Oct 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122181
Bug ID: 122181
Summary: CSE of phi nodes during phiopt
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14 Regression] internal |[13 Regression] internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102901
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:05d3dd6010a53e93e1693001eba4c88a7face53b
commit r16-4269-g05d3dd6010a53e93e1693001eba4c88a7face53b
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Tue O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 86052, which changed state.
Bug 86052 Summary: [PDT] ICE with parameterized derived types
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86052
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173
Bug 82173 depends on bug 102901, which changed state.
Bug 102901 Summary: ICE (segfault) when compiling pdt_13.f03 with -fcheck=all
in gfc_check_pdt_dummy -> structure_alloc_comps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102901
Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
OK, thanks, I'll get the atomicy_dir stuff cleaned up.
I'm also testing a simpler patch to fix all the warning regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122181
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> For two incoming edges a hash-map from std::pair would work
> (sinking suports more than two edges). I guess a standard hash-adaptor for
> hash-tree for std::p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122179
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:decd4277e97114922ce60786a4587a31545dba94
commit r16-4260-gdecd4277e97114922ce60786a4587a31545dba94
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122185
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Summary|[16 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114977
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122185
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122083
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|15.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this has been fixed a long time ago.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122188
Bug ID: 122188
Summary: [16 Regression] crash on __builtin_ctzg: Segmentation
fault
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122187
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122186
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122185
--- Comment #10 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> > Looks like this code is originally from https://github.com/OpenTTD/OpenTTD .
>
> Specifically:
> https://github.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122127
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122122
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:075310d3a3ef1a8b483b62d9535887b37f291ee4
commit r16-4255-g075310d3a3ef1a8b483b62d9535887b37f291ee4
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Mon O
71 matches
Mail list logo