https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121982
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79266
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note changing the array to `const char *` still does not fix the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|12245 |
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67565
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114638
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Wrong bug #.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39992 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39992
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114638
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117982
Bug 117982 depends on bug 106658, which changed state.
Bug 106658 Summary: [C++23] P2590 - Explicit lifetime management
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |16.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940
Bug 98940 depends on bug 106658, which changed state.
Bug 106658 Summary: [C++23] P2590 - Explicit lifetime management
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21462
Bug 21462 depends on bug 10050, which changed state.
Bug 10050 Summary: ifcvt is not smart enough
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33158
Bug 33158 depends on bug 10050, which changed state.
Bug 10050 Summary: ifcvt is not smart enough
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c1e1691b95e65c53a2b9c25de70c56655215b905
commit r16-3944-gc1e1691b95e65c53a2b9c25de70c56655215b905
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121976
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[13/14/15/16 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62413|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62411|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121984
--- Comment #2 from Yavor Doganov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This has been broken since r11-7871-g42a21b4cb540be .
Yes, sorry I forgot to mention that. I partially reverted it in my local copy
(at the expense of struct-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 62412
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62412&action=edit
Slightly more
__is_convertible here is important I think.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Created attachment 62412 [details]
> Slightly more
>
> __is_convertible here is important I think.
My reduced testcase only need -std=c++20.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.1.0
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 62411
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62411&action=edit
Reduced somewhat
I think this can be further reduced.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503
--- Comment #11 from Fred J. Tydeman ---
In gcc 15.2.1, this is still broken.
If the code generation will not be fixed, then
DEC_EVAL_METHOD should be set to -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24775
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus ---
Looking at the extra output, one can find e.g. for
kernels-decompose-pr104774-1.c the following additional output:
c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-decompose-pr104774-1.c:22:9: note: beginning
‘gang-single’ part
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, the DECL_EXPR gimplification which adds the .DEFERRED_INIT call is pretty
dumb, it simply adds it for all automatic vars which don't have DECL_INITIAL
set and don't have uninitialized or indeterminate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reducing ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #5)
> Thus, at least this part looks consistent - and doing the following would be
> fine:
This should have been:
--- a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/kernels-deco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121966
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed on trunk for GCC 16 by the above patches.
Keeping open to track backporting
r16-3940-gc0b21d1f45ac6a249974982c1a7f7515efb78747 to gcc 15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121966
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41f071a64ff7027a98e6b6a7e3641156e3be70e0
commit r16-3941-g41f071a64ff7027a98e6b6a7e3641156e3be70e0
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121966
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0b21d1f45ac6a249974982c1a7f7515efb78747
commit r16-3940-gc0b21d1f45ac6a249974982c1a7f7515efb78747
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 62410
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62410&action=edit
Add missing "*/" in dg-comment line of c-c++-common/goacc-gomp/
This is somewhat unrelated to the actual issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121986
Bug ID: 121986
Summary: Add support for descriptions of fix-it hints
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: SARIF
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121985
Robin Dapp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121958
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5)
> The patch doesn't contain documentation for the new option.
>
> Looks like there's a bug in regenerate-opt-urls.py where it fails to emit a
> comment mentioning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121623
--- Comment #21 from Frank Scheiner ---
Also reproduces the problem:
```
root@esprimo-e420:/usr/src# ia64-t2-linux-gnu-g++ -fcompare-debug -std=c++17
-fpermissive -nostdinc++ -fno-PIE -c -DUSE_LIBUNWIND_EXCEPTIONS -g -O2
-fchecking=1 -DIN_GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121623
--- Comment #20 from Frank Scheiner ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #19)
> Try building it with the same version. You may also need an explicit -std=...
Thanks a lot, that did it, in the end I used 15.2.0 and the minimum standard to
comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-17
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121985
--- Comment #2 from Sujay Kothadiya ---
Created attachment 62409
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62409&action=edit
Verbose log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121985
Sujay Kothadiya changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||x86
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a7a9f0de4fe01ee96350892066afbe5aca4bc0a6
commit r16-3936-ga7a9f0de4fe01ee96350892066afbe5aca4bc0a6
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121985
Bug ID: 121985
Summary: [RISCV] [Miscompile] GCC - riscv64 target, miscompiles
at -O3 as well as -O2 on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121984
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 12.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111861
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3268c47c08782efe7fb1dd9a110bebe018e7d59c
commit r16-3933-g3268c47c08782efe7fb1dd9a110bebe018e7d59c
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121984
Bug ID: 121984
Summary: Build failure on AIX 7.{1,3}: implicit declaration of
function 'rs6000_special_adjust_field_align'
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
sable-multilib
--enable-libsanitizer --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-20250917113826-r16-3928-gd81e24bbb930e2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250917 (experimental) (GCC)
unk-20250917113826-r16-3928-gd81e24bbb930e2-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250917 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118955
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
Tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
La
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121981
Bug ID: 121981
Summary: internal compiler error: in hash, at
cp/constraint.cc:1999
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121161
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
The nop comes from the need of debugging. Specifically from cfgcleanup:
```
/* If not optimizing, preserve the locus of the single edge between
blocks A and B if necessary by emitting a nop. */
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121980
Bug ID: 121980
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2545R4, Read-Copy Update (RCU)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: c++26
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121979
Bug ID: 121979
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2530R3, Hazard Pointers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: c++26
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58727
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121974
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Summary|Timeout with -O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121962
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121778
--- Comment #4 from Dusan Stojkovic ---
Created attachment 62404
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62404&action=edit
The rv32 combine dump
I added the dumps for reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121978
--- Comment #2 from Mathias Stearn ---
Facepalm. Ok, not actually a regression. Repros on at least 14 and 15 when
assertions are enabled: https://godbolt.org/z/1dMPh8sax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121964
--- Comment #2 from Yury Khrustalev ---
Patch v1: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=52149
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121778
--- Comment #3 from Dusan Stojkovic ---
Created attachment 62403
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62403&action=edit
The rv64 combine dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121978
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Mathias Stearn from comment #0)
> Created attachment 62401 [details]
> repro.cpp
>
> Lightly modified from the repro for
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101244 while trying out a
> w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121778
--- Comment #2 from Dusan Stojkovic ---
Created attachment 62402
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62402&action=edit
A patch which contains a pattern to Improve rotation detection for rv32gc_zbb
This patch helps with detectio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119085
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121978
Bug ID: 121978
Summary: [16 regression] ICE in coroutine when return_value
takes int reference
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119085
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f21edc2a760862eab9e542aa7e4fc7886dbd41f
commit r13-9892-g2f21edc2a760862eab9e542aa7e4fc7886dbd41f
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
If I try reproduce to manually reproduce
> FAIL: c-c++-common/goacc-gomp/nesting-1.c -std=c++17 at line 30 (test for
> warnings, line 31)
I see (a) that there is '*/' missing in the first line. And I se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102217
Mathias Stearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Martin Jambor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d3d58554cfdac348e62b4c340cf56499c8d3003
commit r13-9891-g7d3d58554cfdac348e62b4c340cf56499c8d3003
Author: Martin Jambor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101244
Mathias Stearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121977
Bug ID: 121977
Summary: gomp/member-1.C ICE with -ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I guess as a temporary workaround I could stick
// { dg-additional-options "-ftrivial-auto-var-init=uninitialized" { target
c++26 } }
until this is fixed.
That said, I'm afraid I have no idea what those test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121976
Bug ID: 121976
Summary: DFP expression evaluations not consistent
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121975
Bug ID: 121975
Summary: Various goacc failures with
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121393
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Stubbs ---
The bug is not reproducible without the "collapse(3)" statement, nor when
compiled for native amdgcn (no offloading).
However, in both cases this is because the load does not vectorize. The "vect"
dump says
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58727
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cda451531c6d58e3f02e203d008d9ea13397bf26
commit r16-3931-gcda451531c6d58e3f02e203d008d9ea13397bf26
Author: Shreya Munnangi
Date: Wed S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113460
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It was fixed on trunk by r15-3203-g5cca7517c5868b:
c++/coros: do not assume coros don't nest [PR113457]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121963
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Summary|Make i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121968
--- Comment #6 from Liam Powell ---
> Moreover, external files are missing, we need a self-contained reproducer
Attached above. `gcc -gnat2022 -c prunt-controller.adb` will trigger the bug.
This also appears to produce a different bug box on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113457
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113460
Mathias Stearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121968
--- Comment #5 from Liam Powell ---
Created attachment 62400
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62400&action=edit
Self-contained reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121972
Bug ID: 121972
Summary: [PDT] pdt_3.f03 leaks memory
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
A
ng time.
foundBugs $ time ../results.20250915.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w -O1 bug1122.c
real0m0.332s
user0m0.321s
sys 0m0.011s
foundBugs $ (ulimit -t 60; time ../results.20250917.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc -c -w
-O1 bug1122.c)
gcc: fatal error: Killed signal terminated program cc1
compilation terminated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97452
Mathias Stearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redbeard0531 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
--- Comment #5 from Vincenzo Romano ---
I would say that "naked" functions should never go through any optimizer, by
design, as they only contain hand crafted assembly code (marked as volatile in
my case).
All optimizations (-O1 to -O3 and -Os)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121971
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Guess we want a [[shouldtail]] where not tail-calling is OK semantically but
highly desireable for performance. [[musttail]] is like [[always_inline]],
it's considered wrong-code when not possible.
OTOH t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Naked attribute is just a hack anyways around not having a .s file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
--- Comment #2 from Vincenzo Romano ---
Fair. What about 1st function?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Using extended inline asm in naked functions is undefined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121973
Vincenzo Romano changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
--- Comment #3 from Vincenzo Romano
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
