https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7083aeaef5b6d8be1ae419b834e8e56d90026ace
commit r16-2367-g7083aeaef5b6d8be1ae419b834e8e56d90026ace
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121181
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121181
Bug ID: 121181
Summary: ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu: in set_fini_priority, at
symtab.cc:1903 with destructor
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83247
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > Some failures ...
> >
> > gnat.dg/opt86a.adb: pattern found 1 times
> > FAIL: gnat.dg/opt86a.adb scan-tree-dump-t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120867
Bug 120867 depends on bug 120859, which changed state.
Bug 120859 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/afdo-crossmodule-1b.c compilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120859
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120859
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120859
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9de2fbf46cdfb9f0ed8c1fb7e7524443e975ff29
commit r16-2366-g9de2fbf46cdfb9f0ed8c1fb7e7524443e975ff29
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120555
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||terryinzaghi at 163 dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121172
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.2
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #72 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Milian Wolff from comment #69)
> Here's another test case that still emits warnings in latest GCC trunk as
> available through godbolt: https://godbolt.org/z/cWaca3s5s
I think this is PR 116090
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121180
--- Comment #4 from Halalaluyafail3 ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> So is MSVC. So maybe this is a defect in the standard ...
I can make bug reports for libc++ and MSVC's STL too. If this is a defect, what
would make std::any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121180
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually I think this is valid since std::any is in the tail padding of the
base class of J here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121180
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So is MSVC. So maybe this is a defect in the standard ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121180
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
LLVM's libc++ has the same behavior here ...
you make me feel insane – rebecca
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1h0mw6RJX9IODRhL5T8aMcROZDTQY1bTQeqAEgqnd0dM/edit?usp=sharing#TkwAzO8
are you serious right now?? – lauren
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_mSFedxtPqDadkvUww75hdUF4cyCZP_vJlVYQEtwTZo/edit?usp=sharing#PbCWtqwO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Teylu ---
Btw, it isn't that it _never_ works:
```
package LOCAL_IO is
function GET_NEXT return Integer;
end LOCAL_IO;
package body LOCAL_IO is
type TEXT_TYPE (LENGTH : Positive := 1) is record
null;
e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121180
Bug ID: 121180
Summary: std::any allows for creating multiple empty objects of
the same type at the same address
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109267
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Update patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-July/690018.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121173
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am still trying to figure out how to reproduce this since using he trunk on
x86_64-linux-gnu does not produce a warning and using GCC 10 from ubuntu 2204
also does not produce a warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121177
--- Comment #2 from Rohan Lean ---
I have crossposted to the LLVM bugtracker at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/149661, because clang also does no
elisions here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121178
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Schulz ---
oh well sorry, in the last snipped that line
#pragma omp target enter data map(to:t.data[0:20])
should not be there...
it should be like:
mytensor t;
int strides[2]={1,2};
int extents[2]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121178
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Schulz ---
and something else:
Assume I want to create a struct with a temporary matrix only on gpu, with
known extents, known strides, and just allocated data, that is not on the host.
The mapping macros require t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121179
Bug ID: 121179
Summary: When importing std, chrono calculation will cause a
compilation error
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109267
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
```
proc check_effective_target_trap { } {
return [check_no_messages_and_pattern trap "!\\(call" rtl-expand {
void foo ()
{
return __builtin_trap ();
}
} "" ]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121134
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
*** Bug 121163 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ---
*** Bug 121162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121162
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121163
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121124
Dimitar Dimitrov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121124
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Dimitar Dimitrov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e42799be2bb2966487c27897294426a03a99f56d
commit r16-2362-ge42799be2bb2966487c27897294426a03a99f56d
Author: Dimitar Dimitrov
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61200|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121178
Bug ID: 121178
Summary: gcc openacc: libgomp: struct not mapped for detach
operation if the borders are given on delete, nvc++
compiles correctly
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119100
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0e28fd03f65bb4c76f8eb5ce1e5d56b76897199
commit r16-2361-ga0e28fd03f65bb4c76f8eb5ce1e5d56b76897199
Author: Paul-Antoine Arras
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
--- Comment #6 from printfne at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-July/690005.html
Ok. Thank you very much. I'm looking forward to your patch being merged soon(In
reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121171
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121176
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121177
Bug ID: 121177
Summary: Possibly missed allocation elision
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Given that
#include
int main() {
int v[] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6};
std::mdspan> view{v, 2, 3};
return 0;
}
compiles, I think more likely
libstdc++-v3/src/c++23/std.cc.in
needs the
//
#if __glibc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|std::dextents was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>import std;
Oh wait, maybe it is because mdspan is not included in bits/std.cc yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely this feature of c++26 has not been implemented yet ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121176
Bug ID: 121176
Summary: Missed optimization: mixed alignas + vectorization +
inline
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121175
Bug ID: 121175
Summary: [modules] ICE with explicit specialization of template
class (internal compiler error: in tree_node, at
cp/module.cc:9975)
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121174
Bug ID: 121174
Summary: std::dextents was not found, which prevented
std::mdspan from specifying dimensions at runtime
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120753
--- Comment #17 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Ah i forgot that mapping macro...
So that is the correct code
mytensor t;
t.data=(double*)omp_target_alloc(sizeof(double)*20,omp_get_default_device());
t.strides=(int*)omp_target_alloc(sizeof(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121173
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Might be related to pr 116090.
Will try to reproduce tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121173
Bug ID: 121173
Summary: false-positive Wmaybe-uninitialized in
std::optional::reset()
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
53 matches
Mail list logo
