https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92492
Bug 92492 depends on bug 92658, which changed state.
Bug 92658 Summary: x86 lacks vector extend / truncate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95764
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87767
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gabravier at gmail dot com
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94962
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.1.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92645
Bug 92645 depends on bug 92658, which changed state.
Bug 92658 Summary: x86 lacks vector extend / truncate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92611
Bug 92611 depends on bug 92658, which changed state.
Bug 92658 Summary: x86 lacks vector extend / truncate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92658
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116375
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120549
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82735
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58889
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 36844, which changed state.
Bug 36844 Summary: Vectorizer doesn't support INT<->FP conversions with
different size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36844
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96654
Bug 96654 depends on bug 36844, which changed state.
Bug 36844 Summary: Vectorizer doesn't support INT<->FP conversions with
different size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36844
What|Removed |Adde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36844
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110648
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95384 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116414
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95384 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cfsteefel at arista dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||madhur4127 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101326
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95384 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95383
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95384 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95384
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 95383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110459
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61586
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61586&action=edit
Fix which needs testcases and full testing
This is the fix which I will finishing up tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82897
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82897
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> Looks like this was fixed in GCC 15:
> ```
> foo:
> .LFB7284:
> .cfi_startproc
> vmovd %edi, %xmm2
> vmovdqa32 %zmm1, %zmm4
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82897
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110459
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108800
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-02-15 00:00:00 |2025-6-4
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105260
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-05
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553
Bug ID: 120553
Summary: Improve code to select between -1 and various values
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #11 from Greg Chandler ---
Actually as I pointed out in a prior update, it works fine as a native...
So the cross is the one that complains about the missing main..
I'm still not sure if that is a bug, or something that is supposed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120552
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>The *.ii is attached.
Looks like it was not attached; most likely due to size. Please compress it and
retry attaching it.
This also might be fixed already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #10 from Greg Chandler ---
Ok, I was wrong, it wasn't the defines
/tmp/gcc-14.2.0/gcc.build.lnx/libiberty# cat 1.c
#define PACKAGE_NAME ""
#define PACKAGE_TARNAME ""
#define PACKAGE_VERSION ""
#define PACKAGE_STRING ""
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120552
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116681
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ric.larsson at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120552
Bug ID: 120552
Summary: Adding ftime-report creates ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #9 from Greg Chandler ---
I've done a lot of digging through the config script and am seeing some absurd
behaviour... The first of the "not detected" files is sys/file.h, and the
conftest.c created for that is this:
/tmp/gcc-14.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42970
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this was fully fixed by r14-4383 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82897
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like this was fixed in GCC 15:
```
foo:
.LFB7284:
.cfi_startproc
vmovd %edi, %xmm2
vmovdqa32 %zmm1, %zmm4
kmovw m(%rip), %k1
vpsrad %xmm2, %zmm0, %zmm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80006
--- Comment #8 from Sam James ---
Indeed, it XPASSes for me on x86_64 now:
+XPASS: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c missing range info for short (test for
warnings, line 51)
+XPASS: gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-11.c missing range info for signed char (test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120050
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-04
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114169
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 113964 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120542
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 61585
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61585&action=edit
Proposed fix which detects whether a return statement is allowed
The patch checks whether a return statement is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119953
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
bad: r15-2208-gd1b25543f93c26
good: r15-2170-g7db47f7b915c5f
still running ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119953
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-04
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||fixed-but-no-testcase
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120551
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120551
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61584
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61584&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Note MSVC ICEs on this.
EDG and clang works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120551
Bug ID: 120551
Summary: Dynamic char array allocation with string literal in
brace initialization fails to use the initialization
if size provided is not constexpr
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89606
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch for the testcase submitted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/685685.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120231
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61583
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61583&action=edit
gcc16-pr120231.patch
Untested patch for the float -> int and int -> float casts and their reverse
ops.
Unfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119994
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 61582
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61582&action=edit
Exploratory patch
This patch tries to improve upon the determination of whether a symbol
is host-as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110339
Bug 110339 depends on bug 119741, which changed state.
Bug 119741 Summary: [C++26] Implement P2495R3, Interfacing stringstreams with
string_view
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119741
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119741
Nathan Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120518
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120518
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9788a1e2486b55dd1ab521e34bfaf9f4974d
commit r16-1119-g9788a1e2486b55dd1ab521e34bfaf9f4974d
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Dat
Hi there,
Just following up to see if you're interested in the THCA article
proposal. Let me know if you'd like to discuss further.
Thanks,
Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119741
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathan Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8537e4851072ea1f1982c4c6ab0d24c9383e9edd
commit r16-1117-g8537e4851072ea1f1982c4c6ab0d24c9383e9edd
Author: Nathan Myers
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d045eb13b0b42870a1f081895df3901112a358f0
commit r16-1118-gd045eb13b0b42870a1f081895df3901112a358f0
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119953
--- Comment #5 from Gabriel Marcano ---
Oh, this may be relevant. This is the output of -v for the generated xgcc that
reproduces the problem:
# gcc/xgcc -v -B. -B gcc/
Reading specs from gcc/specs
COLLECT_GCC=gcc/xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=gcc/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323
--- Comment #11 from Robert Dubner ---
I suspect that the preference for prefix notation is an historical oddity.
And it is not hard to write pseudo code that demonstrates extra temporary
variables might be needed.
And it's always fun to look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119323
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #9)
> This was an interesting exercise.
Good.
> cppcheck was a bit snide about using ++/-- prefix notation for iterators
> rather than the postfix notation, givin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120141
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120502
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0292e066d5e87e84ff00510724987501b3931518
commit r16-1115-g0292e066d5e87e84ff00510724987501b3931518
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120529
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-04
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120550
--- Comment #2 from Edwin Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Created attachment 61581 [details]
> Might be miscompiled before r16-372
>
> Can you re-bisect using this testcase? This changes your main into a new
> function whic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513
--- Comment #8 from Greg Chandler ---
I've been digging deeper on this, and am starting to wonder if there is
something else going on behind the scenes in the build.
For example:
# grep limits.h /tmp/log-alpha
checking for limits.h... no
chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120542
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120550
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61581
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61581&action=edit
Might be miscompiled before r16-372
Can you re-bisect using this testcase? This changes your main into a new
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120550
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120550
Bug ID: 120550
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O3 since
r16-372-g064cac730f8
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120479
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120548
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So the fix needs to also check for a leading ' ' as the sign character:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/format
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/format
@@ -2398,9 +2398,16 @@ namespace __format
const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116775
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
on a bit more examination - it seems to me that:
http://eel.is/c++draft/expr.await#2
says that this should be ill-formed
Since the GCC doc says:
Built-in Function: int __builtin_constant_p (exp)
You can u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120548
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's also wrong for:
format(std::locale("en_GB.UTF-8"), "{:+L}", 123.45) == "+,123.45"
format(std::locale("en_GB.UTF-8"), "{: L}", 123.45) == " ,123.45"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120545
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|Explicitly delet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120544
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120548
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120548
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89606
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||fixed-but-no-testcase
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99838
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #44 from Nicolas Boulenguez ---
Created attachment 61580
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61580&action=edit
v18 truncate instead of rounding
Hello.
> To_Timeval is rounding values whereas it is currently truncat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99838
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c77dd2d7d40d4fb0d141bf61544d8a57d501f981
commit r15-9763-gc77dd2d7d40d4fb0d141bf61544d8a57d501f981
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120547
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108358
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120549
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120549
Bug ID: 120549
Summary: call((struct s1){}) causes two stack locations and a
memcpy followed by a memset
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25500
Bug 25500 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13952
Bug 13952 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22156
Bug 22156 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117793
Bug 117793 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113964
Bug 113964 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106106
Bug 106106 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36598
Bug 36598 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89606
Bug 89606 depends on bug 14295, which changed state.
Bug 14295 Summary: [tree-ssa] copy propagation for aggregates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14295
What|Removed |Added
-
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
