https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120355
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d8e7a2dbe736a57e4cec0293387a1c558b5a155e
commit r15-9748-gd8e7a2dbe736a57e4cec0293387a1c558b5a155e
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86693
Petr Skocik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pskocik at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119856
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 61556
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61556&action=edit
Patch to correct runtime behavior of repeated use of the same format
This patch corrects a latent problem. ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e131ba3de5f487f5e957ba1b011c960fce557c7b
commit r16-1026-ge131ba3de5f487f5e957ba1b011c960fce557c7b
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 119780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a746747e2102c965a7736dc22ba56c3bc8e3e61e
commit r16-1024-ga746747e2102c965a7736dc22ba56c3bc8e3e61e
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119780
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 119773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120258
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
_5 = a.1_2 * -2147483647;
_6 = b.0_1 + _5;
vs:
_3 = b.0_1 + a.1_2;
slsr_10 = a.1_2 * -2147483648;
_6 = _3 - slsr_10;
Obvious this introduces an signed integer overflow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 120487 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120494
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120493
Bug ID: 120493
Summary: 2 different functions to get call RTX from CALL_INSN
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120494
Bug ID: 120494
Summary: get_call_fndecl requires REG_CALL_DECL note
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: othe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d10e3e0900c92479a6621e375070d4a99ca1fd57
commit r16-1023-gd10e3e0900c92479a6621e375070d4a99ca1fd57
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120491
Bug ID: 120491
Summary: Wrong line coverage for C++ constructor with multiline
initialization list
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #24 from Steven Munroe ---
It looks like GCC 12/13 are handling this better (not generating vector store
reload). I I'll check into GCC 14 went i get a chance.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120490
Bug ID: 120490
Summary: Wrong line coverage for inline function as an arm of
switch-case
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120487
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -Os on|[15/16 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120489
Bug ID: 120489
Summary: Wrong line coverage in loops with continue statements
and dereferencing of pointer variables
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250530 (experimental) (GCC)
[515] %
[515] % gcctk -Os small.c
[516] % ./a.out
Aborted
[517] %
[517] % cat small.c
int printf(const char
-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250530 (experimental) (GCC)
[525] %
[525] % gcctk -O1 small.c
[526] % ./a.out
Aborted
[527] % cat small.c
int a, ac, b, c;
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120486
Bug ID: 120486
Summary: Line coverage for nested ternary expressions counts
overlapping paths
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120485
Bug ID: 120485
Summary: Superfluous branch coverage and condition coverage
before preprocessor directives
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120484
Bug ID: 120484
Summary: Wrong line coverage triggered by loop, else-clause,
and variable declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120483
Bug ID: 120483
Summary: character(len=:), allocatable, save variable returns
incorrect substring
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118903
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #6 from Gaius Mulley ---
When compiled with gm2 after the patch above has been applied, we get a clean
compile.
$ gm2 -c testxindr2.mod
$ echo $?
0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
I could be mistaken, but VNx4QI is a partial vector, so every QI element
occupies 32-bits (so we'd use a widening load here).
I'm not sure this operation is valid for partial vectors as it means you're
ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120389
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
Confirmed.
Also this code provokes the bug:
$ cat testxindr2.mod
MODULE testxindr2 ; (*!m2iso+gm2*)
CONST
NulName = 0 ;
TYPE
Name = CARDINAL ;
PROCEDURE set (VAR n: Name) ;
BEGIN
n := NulName
EN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
--- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2025-05-29 3:41 p.m., redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
>
> --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> I suppose another way to resolve thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118903
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119240
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
See Also|https://gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106902
--- Comment #39 from Alexander Monakov ---
> I don't think we need any mass rebuilds there, I'm fine with approving
> a change of the default now. The question is what to do for languages
> other than C/C++, that complication might be a reason
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114022
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120423
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Joh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> You mean before 15.2? I guess I could.
Yes, before 15.2 :-)
Please do, it would be appreciated to have better debugging.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102599
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
commit r16-1020-g490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114022
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
commit r16-1020-g490072b927dac2f57e541b0ee680896e23c5d998
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:611d59589d8c48db051b31e727d7f52910a4cbcd
commit r16-1019-g611d59589d8c48db051b31e727d7f52910a4cbcd
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113563
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Nathaniel Shead from comment #14)
> Created attachment 61550 [details]
> pr113563 testcase
>
> I'd briefly started looking at this a while back and had written some tests,
> but I'd gotten stu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119298
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 119298, which changed state.
Bug 119298 Summary: [15/16 Regression] 538.imagick_r is faster when compiled
with GCC 14.2 and -Ofast -flto -march=native than with master on Zen5 since
r15-3441-g4292297a0f938f
https://gcc.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120463
--- Comment #1 from Dubois ---
Created attachment 61555
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61555&action=edit
Files necessary to reproduce the bug : sources code, obj, ali etc.., gpr & data
files.
No more comment.. You've [Gnat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61549|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119610
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.4.1
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119610
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e591109238fad430e94ae58f8f90b4bc9c8592a3
commit r12-8-ge591109238fad430e94ae58f8f90b4bc9c8592a3
Author: Richard S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f37c5f1d88c9da17f16cdb33e7c9d43e4bb5f64d
commit r16-1017-gf37c5f1d88c9da17f16cdb33e7c9d43e4bb5f64d
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Wed May 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120354
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70418e6c0120cfce33ab69628602dfdadbed683a
commit r16-1018-g70418e6c0120cfce33ab69628602dfdadbed683a
Author: Qing Zhao
Date: Thu May 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120193
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You mean before 15.2? I guess I could.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120180
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b368dd5de53fc981b5b20e2fd6d7de9116e82331
commit r15-9745-gb368dd5de53fc981b5b20e2fd6d7de9116e82331
Author: Sandra Loose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120357
--- Comment #9 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> The following fixes this. I'm not 100% convinced but it does seem "obvious"
> (but for the "peeled" case we seem to eventually create duplicate COND
> reduct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120341
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:02c58bc4b0885f5b6f50033da35768ebe6c4a030
commit r16-1012-g02c58bc4b0885f5b6f50033da35768ebe6c4a030
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120341
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Summary|[15/16 Regregr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120459
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Before sched2:
(insn 2301 536 2302 9 (set (reg:DI 10 a0 [2652])
(plus:DI (reg/f:DI 2 sp)
(const_int 2047 [0x7ff]))) "addi.cc":99:73 5 {adddi3}
(nil))
(insn 2302 2301 1693 9 (set (r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2025-05-27 00:00:00 |2025-5-30
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec78a0d9962f144b13c6da3ebec1f76c61a701d5
commit r13-9730-gec78a0d9962f144b13c6da3ebec1f76c61a701d5
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fa1f93eb7e39ccabf39a45e89f1a35adcf1bf1f
commit r15-9744-g9fa1f93eb7e39ccabf39a45e89f1a35adcf1bf1f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119835
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:543f7e1d59f0b6628e0de6610ad5e1cf7150090b
commit r16-1006-g543f7e1d59f0b6628e0de6610ad5e1cf7150090b
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4def864a27c41025bbed0d086fa4628921fec28
commit r14-11819-gf4def864a27c41025bbed0d086fa4628921fec28
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120423
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 61553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61553&action=edit
Reduced C test case
Here is a reduced C test case:
struct data
{
int a;
int b;
};
unsigned char v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c13d5b939fee565047394475952878dc5394fb74
commit r16-1005-gc13d5b939fee565047394475952878dc5394fb74
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #30 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ceb2d19235478213219bb722cf4248a1ac78b73c
commit r13-9729-gceb2d19235478213219bb722cf4248a1ac78b73c
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120423
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #8 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I think we should revert the patch for PR99015 I committed yesterday. There
were to many changes in this part of LRA since gcc-13 and many of them were
interdependent. It will be difficult to find all n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:004523c9530f94ae3d64d4c9967ff90388bc
commit r14-11818-g004523c9530f94ae3d64d4c9967ff90388bc
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120357
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
The following fixes this. I'm not 100% convinced but it does seem "obvious"
(but for the "peeled" case we seem to eventually create duplicate COND
reduction IVs? But possibly we reject this case anyhow).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120482
Bug ID: 120482
Summary: Line coverage for inline functions combine its
different callers in inconsistent ways
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120355
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Koenig :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e77309047a7b479c89f03dcaf2994e050d0f33e
commit r16-1003-g0e77309047a7b479c89f03dcaf2994e050d0f33e
Author: Thomas Koenig
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120355
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15/16 Regression] Type |[15 Regression] Type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
--- Comment #2 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
For weekday, we could also consider printing !ok() values unmodified. They
always will be greater than 7, so there is no confusion in the output.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
Similar issue appears also for using '%w' and '%u' on the weekday that contains
a 2 or 3 digit number:
```
std::cout << std::format("{:%w}", weekday(120)) << std::endl; // prints 8
std::cout << std::format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120481
Bug ID: 120481
Summary: Incorrect format result for using specifier with
multi-digit month, day or weekday
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 104928, which changed state.
Bug 104928 Summary: std::counting_semaphore on Linux can sleep forever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Picking 22fe83d6fc9f59311241c981bcad58b61e2056d4 fixes the preprocessed source,
I'm checking whether the cross build succeeds then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #15)
> FTR, clobbers are already marked as having side effects:
Oops, I got the logic wrong. Please disregard this comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
typedef struct {
int digits;
int emax;
int emin
} decContext;
decContext decSetSubnormal_set;
decSetSubnormal() { decContext worksetworkset = decSetSubnormal_set; }
is a reduced testcase that fails w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111901
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #12)
>
> > So what about just marking inline asms with memory clobber as having side
> > effects?
> I guess this would wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120480
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It's caused by r13-9726-gaf73c8bf516884
inition -version -fbuilding-libgcc
-fno-stack-protector -fPIC -o decNumber.s
GNU C17 (SUSE Linux) version 13.3.1 20250530 [revision
03ae1212a94a8800f0dbc6a3df9bf557a93c63b8] (s390x-suse-linux)
compiled by GNU C version 14.3.0, GMP version 6.3.0, MPFR version
4.2.2, MPC version 1.3.1, isl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120457
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88322
Bug 88322 depends on bug 104928, which changed state.
Bug 104928 Summary: std::counting_semaphore on Linux can sleep forever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104928
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
