https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> It bisects to r15-8901-g7bec4570301c43 which I find very surprising. Double
> checked with a build of r15-8900-g525d4a10302113 (which works) and
> r15-8901-g7bec4570301c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
--- Comment #8 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
On 5/27/25 15:04, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
>
> --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
> (In reply to kargls from comment #4)
>> FX, Iain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[15/16 regression] gnat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114676
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ca5e3ededa5b852fe4218457a6f10df3f7b7cb5
commit r13-9718-g9ca5e3ededa5b852fe4218457a6f10df3f7b7cb5
Author: Andreas Kreb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114676
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andreas Krebbel
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9cd936038de231b5541ae150ef2d815fec28015a
commit r12-5-g9cd936038de231b5541ae150ef2d815fec28015a
Author: Andreas Kre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
--- Comment #14 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #13)
> >
> > constexpr std::size_t ProcessChunkSize = BlockSize * OrderSize;
> >
> > std::array buffer{};
> >
> > std::byte* const bytes = reinterpret_cast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
--- Comment #13 from Hongtao Liu ---
>
> constexpr std::size_t ProcessChunkSize = BlockSize * OrderSize;
>
> std::array buffer{};
>
> std::byte* const bytes = reinterpret_cast(data);
>
> for (std::size_t i = 0; i < TotalSize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
--- Comment #9 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #8)
> The patch failed to build texi file for me on RHEL9.
Forgot to mention, my RHEL9 is bundled with makeinfo 6.7.
For makeinfo 6.8+ (bundled with Ubuntu 22.04), i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
Haochen Jiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112824
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao Liu ---
>
> Add --param sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed=2048 will eliminate those
> spills
>
> So for sra we can consider using MOVE_MAX * move_ratio as the size limit for
> Ospeed which represents real backend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119181
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 119181, which changed state.
Bug 119181 Summary: Missed vectorization due to imperfect SLP discovery for 2
grouped load with same base pointer (taken as 1 interleaved load)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119181
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bc5b47f5b06dc4e8d2e7b622a7100b40b8e6b27
commit r16-924-g1bc5b47f5b06dc4e8d2e7b622a7100b40b8e6b27
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120445
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-27
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #5 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
--- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #4)
> > FX, Iain,
> >
> > Can one of you please fix this bug or revert your patch?
>
> It would be unfortunate to ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #4)
> FX, Iain,
>
> Can one of you please fix this bug or revert your patch?
It would be unfortunate to return to the situation where we cannot use
autoreconf to regenerate t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
--- Comment #12 from Shawn Xu ---
Bisecting with -mprefer-vector-width=256 leads to PR112824, which seems to be a
modification on the move_max option. Compiling with -mmove-max=256 reproduces
the issue in 12.1: https://godbolt.org/z/boP6148er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c923901d9cd16b4105312a3319c245cbcb02bf83
commit r13-9716-gc923901d9cd16b4105312a3319c245cbcb02bf83
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112641
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:031e1bf707c9ceb1ec430d41360b6727ad0458db
commit r13-9715-g031e1bf707c9ceb1ec430d41360b6727ad0458db
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118083
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.4|14.3
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e776687d0eb88bf180a3a91be4d24c4fe3163b78
commit r16-922-ge776687d0eb88bf180a3a91be4d24c4fe3163b78
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120354
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120354
--- Comment #3 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ella Ma from comment #2)
> Sorry, I made a mistake when making the example.
> This problem happens when the flex-array member is not the last, **and the
> members below it are in a r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:74a2281ae18c6dbbc640f0c79f7138a495ef8f0c
commit r16-921-g74a2281ae18c6dbbc640f0c79f7138a495ef8f0c
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Created attachment 61529 [details]
> Fix for the breakage by r16-914-g787a8dec1acedf
OK to push after testing. I am rebuilding now and can do for you. It has to be
l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 61529
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61529&action=edit
Fix for the breakage by r16-914-g787a8dec1acedf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
--- Comment #1 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
in the routine "finish_struct" of c-decl.cc, we have:
9660 if (warn_flex_array_member_not_at_end
9661 && !is_last_field
9662 && RECORD_OR_UNION_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (x)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120449
--- Comment #4 from Zartaj Majeed ---
Thanks - and what about this?
No warning from
g++ -c -Wtype-limits -std=c++20 -Wsystem-headers typelimits.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #10)
> Seems like some last-minute cleanup before submission broke something.
> I'll have a look.
It was the last-minute cleanup. Duh!
This fixes it:
diff --gi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120449
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #7)
> > > Ruuning tests right now to see if this has caused some bre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Aside: FX, please use --author when committing somebody else's patch, so that
the Author: field in git and the generated ChangeLog are correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115046
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2e2688af937957f82823027b3ff0c4a9986806a
commit r13-9714-gd2e2688af937957f82823027b3ff0c4a9986806a
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120449
--- Comment #2 from Zartaj Majeed ---
Is -Wsystem-headers a side-effect of -P? Because system headers cannot be
recognized if line numbers are suppressed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115046
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:573422d5543fe88c734a22ba63961153f16531d5
commit r13-9713-g573422d5543fe88c734a22ba63961153f16531d5
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120265
--- Comment #3 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
It should be implemented like LLVM did
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104724/files as part of loop codegen,
which was what LLVM developers told me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120265
--- Comment #2 from mcccs at gmx dot com ---
For future reference, my patch was (rightly) rejected and the discussion can be
seen under "[PATCH] Match: Handle commonly used unsigned modulo counters "
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d2e2688af937957f82823027b3ff0c4a9986806a
commit r13-9714-gd2e2688af937957f82823027b3ff0c4a9986806a
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #7)
> > Ruuning tests right now to see if this has caused some breakage.
>
> Are you also hit by r16-916-g517c9487f8fdc4 which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120400
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee636671898c6bce63d9b2a698007b609aabbfe8
commit r16-919-gee636671898c6bce63d9b2a698007b609aabbfe8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119135
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #7)
> Ruuning tests right now to see if this has caused some breakage.
Are you also hit by r16-916-g517c9487f8fdc4 which breaks texinfo again?
We had this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119135
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a56fdac95755175c760cf35a246414859746d4b3
commit r13-9712-ga56fdac95755175c760cf35a246414859746d4b3
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120431
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #5)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> > > My understanding is they are getting built generated in the build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112453
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|13.4|14.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0779068c39b3774a53309805eab4a7ca970070c
commit r16-917-gd0779068c39b3774a53309805eab4a7ca970070c
Author: Alejandro Colomar
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d9ac1670af224bb9fa2411fe392f98d20fbf751
commit r16-918-g9d9ac1670af224bb9fa2411fe392f98d20fbf751
Author: Alejandro Colomar
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117025
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Joseph Myers :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:517c9487f8fdc4e4e90252a9365e5823259dc783
commit r16-916-g517c9487f8fdc4e4e90252a9365e5823259dc783
Author: Alejandro Colomar
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] templated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE: |[12 Regression] ICE: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120449
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-Wsystem-headers .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5c79c0992acd2244e51d34f8e5dc33f13527cee3
commit r13-9702-g5c79c0992acd2244e51d34f8e5dc33f13527cee3
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117792
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fb526a9a16162c61e468ea566e00aa5dcbdb738
commit r13-9707-g7fb526a9a16162c61e468ea566e00aa5dcbdb738
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115358
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117792
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106760
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:359d5b7edaf7d1c418d2026ba0bc76b52d006364
commit r13-9705-g359d5b7edaf7d1c418d2026ba0bc76b52d006364
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115656
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] Templated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12 Regression] statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 118060, which changed state.
Bug 118060 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE (internal compiler error) on requires
clause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118060
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105848
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e38e851d62c65eb606e61879a72b11d71dac0ce0
commit r13-9706-ge38e851d62c65eb606e61879a72b11d71dac0ce0
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116320
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13 Regression] ICE: |[12 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115656
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7ec472e132a634b9e819e2fcfaac74e07744c26
commit r13-9704-gc7ec472e132a634b9e819e2fcfaac74e07744c26
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116418
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6afaab88c36393acf31599a86bab6dcbe5848928
commit r13-9703-g6afaab88c36393acf31599a86bab6dcbe5848928
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116320
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e4dd09be9cefc349961e7a88561bc1640564fc25
commit r13-9701-ge4dd09be9cefc349961e7a88561bc1640564fc25
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119233
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e38e851d62c65eb606e61879a72b11d71dac0ce0
commit r13-9706-ge38e851d62c65eb606e61879a72b11d71dac0ce0
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115358
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7ff1d5923f2c42ac15780b452dd1bc72d94db64
commit r13-9708-gf7ff1d5923f2c42ac15780b452dd1bc72d94db64
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:787a8dec1acedf5561c8ee43bed0b3653fca150d
commit r16-914-g787a8dec1acedf5561c8ee43bed0b3653fca150d
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #37 from Jerry DeLisle ---
With this now pushed, I plan to backport to 15 in a few days. I also want to
revise the langauge of the error messages to be clearer. This will wiggle on
several existing test cases so I want it to be a se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120431
--- Comment #5 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> > My understanding is they are getting built generated in the build directory
> > which is a recent bug someone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120049
--- Comment #36 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42983ffde6612b7f8a4e7ab3e76fa8b0d136e854
commit r16-915-g42983ffde6612b7f8a4e7ab3e76fa8b0d136e854
Author: Jerry DeLisle
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115206
Abel Sen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103524
Bug 103524 depends on bug 115206, which changed state.
Bug 115206 Summary: ICE: segfault in code involving C++ modules
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115206
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120449
Bug ID: 120449
Summary: g++ -Wtype-limits without -P doesn't warn on unsigned
compare to zero
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120431
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #3)
> My understanding is they are getting built generated in the build directory
> which is a recent bug someone reported. I dont think it has been fixed y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101735
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120161
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85f466ed0d4da336fadd01e43d764326cbabdecb
commit r14-11814-g85f466ed0d4da336fadd01e43d764326cbabdecb
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120439
--- Comment #7 from camel-cdr ---
I suppose it's a question about the intrinsics contract.
The intrinsics by them self don't expose register assignment and don't give you
a way to control it.
Consider the following:
static vuint8m1_t bar(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120448
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-27
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116792
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04871e748862fc48fac739f0ce9769e566ca7cc3
commit r16-909-g04871e748862fc48fac739f0ce9769e566ca7cc3
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120448
Bug ID: 120448
Summary: -fuse-ld=eld should be supported
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120431
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92826
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61526|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120428
--- Comment #11 from Shawn Xu ---
Since r15-3078-g6ea25c041964bf63014fcf7bb68fb1f5a0a4e123 mentions
-mprefer-vector-width, I tried setting -mprefer-vector-width=256 for
compilation. This leads to the same regression in 14.2, but not in 13.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120447
Bug ID: 120447
Summary: [16 Regression] cpython fails to compile on AArch64
after
r16-446-g210d06502f22964c7214586c54f8eb54a6965bfd
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117785
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> (In reply to Hana Dusíková from comment #12)
> > I'm using [[gnu::used]] to emit constexpr symbol so it can be part of
> > compatible interface.
Sure, that wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120443
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
So the reason for the original testcase in comment #0 started to fail on the
trunk is either the inline or IPA-CP change which allowed to happen even into
cold function calls (aka main).
The one in comment
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo